1968
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(68)80475-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of formation of simple spinels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
103
0
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fast-sintering conditions with 50 deg/min heating rate do not lead to more shrinkage. Although the solid state reaction forming the spinel NiMn204 is endothermic (for thermodynamic values see [5]), it is so fast even at low heating rates that rate controlled sintering with 0.1/~m/s shrinkage rate was not possible.…”
Section: Influence Of Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast-sintering conditions with 50 deg/min heating rate do not lead to more shrinkage. Although the solid state reaction forming the spinel NiMn204 is endothermic (for thermodynamic values see [5]), it is so fast even at low heating rates that rate controlled sintering with 0.1/~m/s shrinkage rate was not possible.…”
Section: Influence Of Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it appears that no appreciable interchange among A and B sites by Cu 2+ and Cr 3+ ions occurs in this spinel even at a temperature of 1273 K. The plausible reasons for this may be (i) strong affinity of C1 "z+ ion for B site or (ii) a larger lattice energy of normal CuCr20~ than that of inverse CuCr2Oa at all temperatures. Since the energy difference between normal and inverse spinels is quite small [12], (ii) may not be the deciding factor here and it is the strong affinity of Cr z+ ions for B sites, even at temperatures above 1200 K, which prevents the c/a ratio from changing in quenched CuCrzO~. Thus, it may be concluded that the tetragonal to cubic transition in CuCr204 is a first order, diffusionless, reversible and very fast transition, not only at 860 K but also at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the earlier reports, the increase in the crystallite size can be attributed to the increase in the enthalpy of formation. The enthalpy of formation of Nickel ferrite (−1.22 kcal/mol) is more than that of Zinc ferrite (−2.67 kcal/mol) [30]. Therefore, the formation of Zinc ferrite is more exothermic as compared to the formation of nickel ferrite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%