2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of DNA binding and condensation: isothermal titration calorimetry and electrostatic mechanism 1 1Edited by I. Tinoco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
275
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
42
275
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other experiments estimated the association constant of the phosphate groups of one DNA molecule and spermidinium to be 1.4 ¥ 10 5 M -1 in the absence of DAPI. 26,27 This value is about twenty times as large as that of our results. Spermidinium prefers the minor grooves of DNA, 28 and DAPI also prefers the minor grooves as mentioned above.…”
Section: The Association Constant Of Phosphate Group Of Dna Molecule contrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Some other experiments estimated the association constant of the phosphate groups of one DNA molecule and spermidinium to be 1.4 ¥ 10 5 M -1 in the absence of DAPI. 26,27 This value is about twenty times as large as that of our results. Spermidinium prefers the minor grooves of DNA, 28 and DAPI also prefers the minor grooves as mentioned above.…”
Section: The Association Constant Of Phosphate Group Of Dna Molecule contrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The binding energies obtained from the explicitly hydrated models listed in Table 2 are generally lower than those predicted by the continuum and are better suit to the free energies observed in the DNA-metal binding experiments. 52,53 In both models the Cu 2+ ion binds most strongly at the N7 position, and exhibits an exceptional preference for the N7 site over O6. The Cu 2+ binding to the N3 site provided lower interaction energies (not shown) than for the N7 or O6 complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcharged complexes, and screening of the electrostatic interactions are two causes of such a behaviour, compaction usually being seen as enthalpically driven, with entropic effects opposing the existence of compact structures. Variations in this behavior are sometimes observed for low charge cationic agents [34,35], but the observations are not totally consistent (see, e.g., Ref. [36]).…”
Section: Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 97%