1975
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90010-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of contact angles. II. Rough solid surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
140
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
140
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Typically, the contact angle varies along the three-phase contact line for a liquid drop resting on a rough and/or heterogeneous solid surface. Local changes in angles of inclination of the rough surface 33 and/or variation in chemistry of a heterogeneous surface 34 cause the three-phase contact line to contort. Since the contact angles are typically measured macroscopically for liquid drops with a diameter of a few millimeters using low-magnification optical lenses, the local angles are ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…32 Typically, the contact angle varies along the three-phase contact line for a liquid drop resting on a rough and/or heterogeneous solid surface. Local changes in angles of inclination of the rough surface 33 and/or variation in chemistry of a heterogeneous surface 34 cause the three-phase contact line to contort. Since the contact angles are typically measured macroscopically for liquid drops with a diameter of a few millimeters using low-magnification optical lenses, the local angles are ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 The phenomenon of multiple liquid-solid metastable configurations can be analyzed in terms of the Gibbs energy that takes into account the details of surface geometry, topography and local wettability. Figure 5 shows an imaginary correlation between the Gibbs energy and apparent contact angle for a liquid on a rough or heterogeneous solid surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as calculated in Ref. [30], the relation between free energy and the apparent contact angle for a liquid droplet on a rough surface showed that metastable states existed and were separated by free energy barriers. In other words, different contact angles can be found on rough surfaces.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Ultrahydrophobicitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…the difference between the advancing and receding contact angles, should be considered as well [1]. This is because a water droplet on a rough surface often resides in a metastable state and exhibits a metastable contact angle [28,30]. In this situation, the static contact angle or the advancing contact angle alone is not enough to reflect the wettability of a solid surface.…”
Section: Contact Angles Hysteresismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation