1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022664013648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of Cm(III) in Concentrated Salt Solutions: Carbonate Complexation in NaCl Solution at 25°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to study the influence of carbonate on the complexation of Cm(III) with hTf/2N, the complex formation was studied as a function of pH at physiological carbonate concentration (c(carbonate) tot = 25 mM). The term physiological carbonate concentration describes a total concentration of the species CO 32 Comparison with blank solutions (without hTf/2N) in the same pH range proves that these emission bands result from Cm(III) carbonate interactions and do not represent additional transferrin species. The Cm(III) hTf/2N species with λ max = 619.7 nm is formed at pH ≥ 10.5 which indicates a distinct competition between carbonate and hTf/2N.…”
Section: Complexation Of Cm(iii) With Htf/2n At Physiological Carbonamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In order to study the influence of carbonate on the complexation of Cm(III) with hTf/2N, the complex formation was studied as a function of pH at physiological carbonate concentration (c(carbonate) tot = 25 mM). The term physiological carbonate concentration describes a total concentration of the species CO 32 Comparison with blank solutions (without hTf/2N) in the same pH range proves that these emission bands result from Cm(III) carbonate interactions and do not represent additional transferrin species. The Cm(III) hTf/2N species with λ max = 619.7 nm is formed at pH ≥ 10.5 which indicates a distinct competition between carbonate and hTf/2N.…”
Section: Complexation Of Cm(iii) With Htf/2n At Physiological Carbonamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The main objectives were then the determination of the nature of the species, such as hydrolyzed species, inorganic or organic complexes, and their formation energies. A typical Cm(III) as Cm 3+ 394 594 65 10 − 9 5 × 10 − 13 example is the study of the complexation of Cm(III) by carbonates; TRLIF was used to determine the stoichiometries of the carbonate complexes and the thermodynamic formation constants (Fangh ä nel et al , 1999;Vercouter et al , 2005b). Other complex formation reactions have been successfully investigated by TRLIF (Eliet et al , 1995;Colette et al , 2004;Geipel, 2006;Vercouter et al , 2008), as a complement to classical methods for the determination of chemical data (potentiometry, spectrophotometry, solvent extraction, solubility, electrochemistry, etc.).…”
Section: Time-resolved Laser-induced Fluorescence (Lif) For Analysis mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing of the Pitzer databases should be avoided. Parameters for the Pitzer model used in our calculations are available in the extended Harvie-Møller-Weare database (Na-K-Mg-Ca-H-Cl-SO 4 -OH-HCO 3 -CO 3 /CO 2 -H 2 O system), 9) but also for selected RN, [10][11][12][13][14] heavy metals, and other relevant elements. For systems including cement, aqueous silicate and aluminate species as well as additional solid phases had to be incorporated into the database.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Databasementioning
confidence: 99%