2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.115112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of a Fermi liquid in a magnetic field

Abstract: We extend previous calculations of the nonanalytic terms in the spin susceptibility s ͑T͒ and the specific heat C͑T͒ to systems in a magnetic field. Without a field, s ͑T͒ and C͑T͒ / T are linear in T in two dimensions ͑2D͒, while in 3D, s ͑T͒ ϰ T 2 and C͑T͒ / T ϰ T 2 ln T. We show that in a magnetic field, the linear in T terms in 2D become scaling functions of B H / T. We present explicit expressions for these functions and show that at high fields B H ӷ T, s ͑T , H͒ scales as ͉H͉. We also show that in 3D, s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They performed a perturbative calculation of the momentumdependent spin susceptibility χ s (Q, T = 0) at small Q and found a non-analytic Q 2 ln Q behavior. Later, it was found [30] that the magnetic-field dependence of a nonlinear spin susceptibility parallels the Q-dependence, i.e., χ s (Q = 0, T = 0, H) ∝ H 2 ln |H|. Nonanalyticity of the spin susceptibility was also found for 2D systems by Millis and Chitov [24] and, later, Chubukov and Maslov [27], Galitski et al [29], and Betouras et al [30].…”
Section: Spin Susceptibility In 3dmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They performed a perturbative calculation of the momentumdependent spin susceptibility χ s (Q, T = 0) at small Q and found a non-analytic Q 2 ln Q behavior. Later, it was found [30] that the magnetic-field dependence of a nonlinear spin susceptibility parallels the Q-dependence, i.e., χ s (Q = 0, T = 0, H) ∝ H 2 ln |H|. Nonanalyticity of the spin susceptibility was also found for 2D systems by Millis and Chitov [24] and, later, Chubukov and Maslov [27], Galitski et al [29], and Betouras et al [30].…”
Section: Spin Susceptibility In 3dmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand the previous 3D work [12,15,16] found no special role of backscattering for the T 2 ln T nonanalyticity. (iii) The older work left the impression that in 3D the nonanalyticities were particular to γ and did not contribute to susceptibilities, whereas more recent work (based mainly on perturbative calculations) has demonstrated that nonanalytic corrections to the spin susceptibility occur both in 3D [21] and in 2D [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evaluating the sum one finds that Ω 2 contains a cross term T H 2 [13]. Differentiating over frequency, one then obtains δχ s (T ) ∝ T , as in (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%