2002
DOI: 10.5488/cmp.5.3.553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics and Dielectric Properties of the Nh_4h_2po_4 Type Antiferroelectrics

Abstract: Within the framework of the proton model we study thermodynamic and static dielectric properties of the ADP type antiferroelectrics with taking into account the tunnelling effects of protons on hydrogen bonds. In the fourparticle cluster approximation for the short-range interactions and in the mean field approximation for the long-range interactions we calculate the free energy, entropy, and components of static dielectric susceptibility of the crystals. We also get the system of equations for the sublattice … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In KD 2 PO 4 the calculated difference is (T c − T 0 ) D = 1.159 K, which is rather close to the experimental value 1, 5 K [216]. In RbH 2 PO 4 the theory yields (T c − T 0 ) H = 0.032 K, which agrees with the value obtained with tunneling taken into account [121]. Using the value of T 0 = 147.57 K from [247] for RbH 2 PO 4 we can find that here T c − T 0 ∼ 0.04 K. In KH 2 AsO 4 the calculated difference is (T c − T 0 ) H = 1.281 K; taken tunneling being taken into account increases it up to (T c − T 0 ) H = 1.611 K [121], whereas the experiment gives 2.63 [248] [119].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Calculated Physical Characteristics Of Thesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In KD 2 PO 4 the calculated difference is (T c − T 0 ) D = 1.159 K, which is rather close to the experimental value 1, 5 K [216]. In RbH 2 PO 4 the theory yields (T c − T 0 ) H = 0.032 K, which agrees with the value obtained with tunneling taken into account [121]. Using the value of T 0 = 147.57 K from [247] for RbH 2 PO 4 we can find that here T c − T 0 ∼ 0.04 K. In KH 2 AsO 4 the calculated difference is (T c − T 0 ) H = 1.281 K; taken tunneling being taken into account increases it up to (T c − T 0 ) H = 1.611 K [121], whereas the experiment gives 2.63 [248] [119].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Calculated Physical Characteristics Of Thesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Unfortunately, it is impossible to find the values of the model parameters that would yield a larger value of T c − T 0 and still provide a quantitative agreement with experiment for other characteristics of the crystal. Tunneling being taken into account increases the difference T c − T 0 up to 0.060 [121]. In KD 2 PO 4 the calculated difference is (T c − T 0 ) D = 1.159 K, which is rather close to the experimental value 1, 5 K [216].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Calculated Physical Characteristics Of Thesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations