2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superscripts − and + refer to the flows leaving the system and flows entering the system, respectively. Gutié rrez Ortiz et al [133] performed process simulations using AspenPlus TM for gasification of glycerol in supercritical water. They investigated the effect of process conditions on the hydrogen yield.…”
Section: Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superscripts − and + refer to the flows leaving the system and flows entering the system, respectively. Gutié rrez Ortiz et al [133] performed process simulations using AspenPlus TM for gasification of glycerol in supercritical water. They investigated the effect of process conditions on the hydrogen yield.…”
Section: Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of empirical EOS in general compared to their activity coefficient counterparts is the ability to predict phase equilibria at elevated pressures where infinite dilution in a single phase is experienced [41]. Some of the EOS adapted in literature are the Peng-Robinson (PR) [24,26,28,31,32,35], Soave Redlich Kwong (SRK) [36,38], Duan [27,40], Statistical Association Fluids Theory (SAFT) [25], Virial EOS [30] and the original ideal package [33]. Some authors employed Energies 2016, 9, 838 5 of 27 hybrid approaches to account for inaccuracy of some models, Gassner et al [40] employed a hybrid Duan-Lee Kesler modelling approach for their BioSNG production case.…”
Section: Supercritical Water Gasification Reactor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Withag et al [36] attempted to compare a list of 6 PR and SRK based EOS combinations with non-quadratic mixing rules, and reported a bandwidth of deviation for molar hydrogen prediction below 3.5% for all. However, Ortiz et al [38] examined the accuracy of the predictive SRK EOS for enthalpy prediction, and reported a slight deviation for organic-H 2 O mixtures, which would be amplified with a high water throughput in SCWR. Valderrama [41] in his review of different cubic EOS reiterated that a hybrid approach, that considers integrated excess Gibbs energy models (a non-quadratic mixing rule) within empirical EOS parameters remains necessary to offer more reliable equilibria data for non-ideal mixtures with a supercritical component.…”
Section: Supercritical Water Gasification Reactor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations