1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01979412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic study of anthrone, coumarin and phenazine

Abstract: Anthrone, coumarin and phenazine were studied by combustion calorimetry of small amounts of substance, sublimation calorimetry, neat capacity measurements and differential thermal analysis.The thermodynamic quantities derived at 298.15 K allowed us to determine some energy valuez related to molecular structure which enabled us to realize a comparative study for the two isomers: chromone and coumarin, and determine an enthalpy value for some intramolecular chemical bonds in the molecules studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the experimental value of the enthalpy of formation in the crystalline phase, at T = 298.15 K, obtained in this work, for anthrone, À(75.3 ± 2.7) kJ Á mol À1 , with the values available in the literature, summarized in table 1, it is verified that the value reported in this work is in agreement, within the associated uncertainties, with that published in the past by Sabbah et al [6,7], À(79.9 ± 2.1) kJ Á mol À1 . When compared with the value determined by Verevkin [8], À(85.0 ± 1.2) kJ Á mol À1 , it differs by $9.7 kJ Á mol À1 .…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing the experimental value of the enthalpy of formation in the crystalline phase, at T = 298.15 K, obtained in this work, for anthrone, À(75.3 ± 2.7) kJ Á mol À1 , with the values available in the literature, summarized in table 1, it is verified that the value reported in this work is in agreement, within the associated uncertainties, with that published in the past by Sabbah et al [6,7], À(79.9 ± 2.1) kJ Á mol À1 . When compared with the value determined by Verevkin [8], À(85.0 ± 1.2) kJ Á mol À1 , it differs by $9.7 kJ Á mol À1 .…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previously, we have also detected some inconsistencies between the computational and experimental gas-phase standard molar enthalpies of formation of anthrone [4] when considering their published experimental values [6][7][8] on the calculation of D f H m ðgÞ of other compounds. For that reason, we decided to perform new experimental studies for this compound since its thermochemical parameters are crucial for the calibration of computational approaches used for the estimation of thermodynamic properties of compounds derived from anthrone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The denser (Z 2) phase of phenazine has a higher melting point than the (Z 4) phase, which does not fit the requirements of an enantiotropic system. The phenazine (Z 4) phase appears to be monotropic, and this is supported by the absence of a transition in a DTA study of (Z 2) phenazine [24]. Specific heat measurements on the two phenazine polymorphs would be of great interest for further understanding of this system.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 92%