Thermodynamic properties of zirconium chlorides I. The standard molar enthalpy of formation, the low-temperature heat capacity, the standard molar entropy, and the standard molar Gibbs energy of formation of zirconium trichloride

Efimov, M.E.; Prokopenko, I. V.; Tsirel'nikov, V.I.; Troyanov, Sergey I.; Медведев, В. А.; Berezovskii, G. A.; Paukov, I. E.

doi:10.1016/0021-9614(87)90117-0

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Standard enthalpies of formation for products and reactants were determined from the literature, including the USGS Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances , other reference materials (Binnewies & Milke, 2002; National Institute of Standards & Technology, 2023; Reed, 2020; Robie & Hemingway, 1995; Robie et al., 1978; Zumdahl & Zumdahl, 2007), and individual studies (Acker et al., 1999; Chen & Zeng, 1996; Coulier & Tremaine, 2014; Cubicciotti et al., 1977; Efimov et al., 1987; Gamsjager et al., 2005; Graham & Hepler, 1956; Hemingway et al., 1986; Jacob & Seetharaman, 1994; Ko et al. 1974; Mansurova et al., 2018; Perfetti et al., 2008; Tyurin et al., 2020; Zhussupbekov et al., 2020; Zubkov et al., 1998), noted in the Supporting Information Sheet S5.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Standard enthalpies of formation for products and reactants were determined from the literature, including the USGS Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances, other reference materials (Binnewies & Milke, 2002;National Institute of Standards & Technology, 2023;Reed, 2020;Robie & Hemingway, 1995;Robie et al, 1978;Zumdahl & Zumdahl, 2007), and individual studies (Acker et al, 1999;Chen & Zeng, 1996;Coulier & Tremaine, 2014;Cubicciotti et al, 1977;Efimov et al, 1987;Gamsjager et al, 2005;Graham & Hepler, 1956;Hemingway et al, 1986;Jacob & Seetharaman, 1994;Ko et al 1974;Mansurova et al, 2018;Perfetti et al, 2008;Tyurin et al, 2020;Zhussupbekov et al, 2020;Zubkov et al, 1998), noted in the Supporting Information Sheet S5. In cases where standard enthalpies of formation were not available for a given reactant or product, either ΔH o f of a representative alternative compound was used (e.g., FeAsS in place of CoAsS for metallic cobalt production), or if a proxy could not be determined, enthalpy of formation for that reaction was excluded from the analysis.…”

Section: Determination Of Enthalpy and Chemical Emissionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mass, enthalpy, and chemical‐derived emission flows in mineral processing

Kane,

Miller

2024

J of Industrial Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The production of materials from mineral resources is a significant contributor to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This contribution is driven primarily by chemical CO2 emissions from the conversion of mineral resources and emissions tied to energy demands for material processing. In this work, we synthesize the thermodynamically required enthalpy and chemically derived emissions of mineral processing and consumption in the United States. We quantify mass, enthalpy, and emissions flows for minerals described by the US Geological Survey, with 882 mass flows and 155 chemical reactions analyzed. In total, 503 PJ of enthalpy is thermodynamically required for 398 Mt of chemically converted material consumption in the United States, resulting in 129 Mt of chemically derived CO2 emissions. Additionally, 249 PJ of fuel resources such as coke are stoichiometrically required for the chemical conversion of minerals. These enthalpy requirements and CO2 emissions are primarily from high‐mass consumption materials such as cement, carbon steel, fertilizer, and aluminum. Cumulatively, the dataset synthesized in this work provides a complete view of the chemical requirements of mineral processing and can aid in guiding decarbonization or sustainable growth in critical minerals sectors, including construction materials and materials for energy storage or generation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Standard enthalpies of formation for products and reactants were determined from the literature, including the USGS Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances, other reference materials (Binnewies & Milke, 2002;National Institute of Standards & Technology, 2023;Reed, 2020;Robie & Hemingway, 1995;Robie et al, 1978;Zumdahl & Zumdahl, 2007), and individual studies (Acker et al, 1999;Chen & Zeng, 1996;Coulier & Tremaine, 2014;Cubicciotti et al, 1977;Efimov et al, 1987;Gamsjager et al, 2005;Graham & Hepler, 1956;Hemingway et al, 1986;Jacob & Seetharaman, 1994;Ko et al 1974;Mansurova et al, 2018;Perfetti et al, 2008;Tyurin et al, 2020;Zhussupbekov et al, 2020;Zubkov et al, 1998), noted in the Supporting Information Sheet S5. In cases where standard enthalpies of formation were not available for a given reactant or product, either ΔH o f of a representative alternative compound was used (e.g., FeAsS in place of CoAsS for metallic cobalt production), or if a proxy could not be determined, enthalpy of formation for that reaction was excluded from the analysis.…”

Section: Determination Of Enthalpy and Chemical Emissionsmentioning

confidence: 99%