1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.555964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Properties of the Aqueous Ions (2+ and 3+) of Iron and the Key Compounds of Iron

Abstract: Recommended thennochemical property values, AfHo, ArGo, and So for the aqueous ions of iron, F~+ and Fe 3 +, are given at 298.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These derived thermodynamic data were compared with previously published data in Table 2. Adopting the value of -2507.75 ± 1.0 kJ/mol for ∆G f 0 , which corresponds to the standard Gibbs free energy of formation from elements at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa, for melanterite suggested by Parker and Khodakovskii (1995), the ∆G f 0 for rozenite calculated from our ∆G r 0 datum for reaction 1 at 25 °C is -1794.9 ± 1.3 kJ/mol. Similarly, adopting the value of -1879.75 kJ/mol for ∆G f 0 for chalcanthite suggested by Wagman et al (1982), the ∆G f 0 for bonattite calculated from our datum for reaction 2 at 25 °C is -1399.96 kJ/mol, essentially the same value as suggested by Wagman et al (1982).…”
Section: Thermodynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These derived thermodynamic data were compared with previously published data in Table 2. Adopting the value of -2507.75 ± 1.0 kJ/mol for ∆G f 0 , which corresponds to the standard Gibbs free energy of formation from elements at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa, for melanterite suggested by Parker and Khodakovskii (1995), the ∆G f 0 for rozenite calculated from our ∆G r 0 datum for reaction 1 at 25 °C is -1794.9 ± 1.3 kJ/mol. Similarly, adopting the value of -1879.75 kJ/mol for ∆G f 0 for chalcanthite suggested by Wagman et al (1982), the ∆G f 0 for bonattite calculated from our datum for reaction 2 at 25 °C is -1399.96 kJ/mol, essentially the same value as suggested by Wagman et al (1982).…”
Section: Thermodynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are related to the poor choice of AG~ of Fe z+ and Fe 3+ for the prediction of solubility products of end-members (Fe2+: -78.9 kJ/mole, Fe3+: -4.7 kJ/mole). Values of AG7 for aqueous ferrous and ferric iron from Parker and Khodakovskii (1995) are used here. These values enable a new scale of Act = Mz+(aq) values in octahedral coordination to be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Nordstrom (1984) and Reardon and Beckie (1987). Recent work on the solubility of siderite (Preis and Gamsjager, 2002) provides support for the validity of the properties of Fe 2+ in the survey by Parker and Khodakovskii (1995 Table C13.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent studies have revealed respectively the possible existence of substantial errors in the Gibbs free energy of formation of magnesite and dolomite (Rock et al, 2001). Furthermore, the experimental consistency of siderite solubility data (Preis and Gamsjager, 2002) has been recently established, and by inference, validated the thermodynamic data for ferrous and ferric ions recommended by Parker and Khodakovskii (1995). These modifications also require a redetermination of the thermodynamic properties of the ankerite solid solution utilized in earlier work (Xu et al, 2003).…”
Section: C6 Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%