1955
DOI: 10.1021/ie50547a052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Properties of Halogenated Ethanes and Ethylenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
37
2

Year Published

1971
1971
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…from virials of Gillis 12 (1995)d Higashi 1 (1987 Holcomb 9 (1993) IS029 (1989) Tamatsll 33 (1992) Wang 29 (1992) Zha0 36 (1992) Overall Ideal gas heat capacity Chen l2 (1975) Gillis ll (1995) Hozumi-l O (1993) Mears 28 [8.469] chosen over that of Higashi et al 1 because upon extrapolation the majority of the experimental vapor pressure data exhibited a trend towards the Tillner-Roth 2 value at the critical point.) Table 2 lists the reported saturation data and the ideal gas heat capacity data.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from virials of Gillis 12 (1995)d Higashi 1 (1987 Holcomb 9 (1993) IS029 (1989) Tamatsll 33 (1992) Wang 29 (1992) Zha0 36 (1992) Overall Ideal gas heat capacity Chen l2 (1975) Gillis ll (1995) Hozumi-l O (1993) Mears 28 [8.469] chosen over that of Higashi et al 1 because upon extrapolation the majority of the experimental vapor pressure data exhibited a trend towards the Tillner-Roth 2 value at the critical point.) Table 2 lists the reported saturation data and the ideal gas heat capacity data.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of instrument was used in several other studies over the next 46 years. However, while the viscosity results of Edward and Bonilla were confirmed within their estimated uncertainty of 3 % to 5 %, the later measurement results for halogenated hydrocarbons of Mears et al [ 3 ], Phillips and Murphy [ 4 , 5 ], and Shankland et al [ 6 , 7 ] were burdened with systematic errors of up to 33 %, the origin of which was not identified before another decade had passed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The RMS error for the vapor volume ranged from 0.14 to 1.16 percent with an average of 0.50 percent. These differences are on the same order as the accuracy to which the corresponding experimental quantities are known (for example, see Mears et al (1955)).…”
Section: Pure Refrigerantsmentioning
confidence: 99%