The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0211-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Properties of Actinides and Actinide Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The dashed lines are the recommended equations by Konings et al 1819,. however, these equations do not reproduce the heat capacity around the superionic transition19.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. The dashed lines are the recommended equations by Konings et al 1819,. however, these equations do not reproduce the heat capacity around the superionic transition19.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from Ralph21 were calculated using a quasi-local linear regression method on the enthalpy data. The choice of fitting method applied to enthalpy data to calculate specific heat values effects the outcome (values by Ralph21, Konings1819 and Fink20 are calculated using the method of applying a fit through enthaply data). Thus, to ensure a fair comparison, polynomials should be fitted to the MD results that are consistent with the experimental data, as done by Cooper et al 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 The literature available on kinetically inert organometallic complexes agree that U IV is more common and stable than U III , with the redox potentials of Np(Cp)4 and Np(Cp3)Cl around 0.7V below those for the U analogues, 30 and the stability of the An IV halides with respect to decomposition into An III and elemental halogen decreases in the order U > Np > Pu. 31 This means that commonly used organometallic ligands may be strongly influential in changing the preferred formal oxidation state of organo-neptunium complexes, allowing spontaneous reduction of a Np IV centre during a ligand exchange reaction. 32…”
Section: Redox Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, the shuttling of electrons between reducing agents and adsorbed UO 2 2+ is facilitated by the highly conductive surface of magnetite (Becker et al, 2001;Missana et al, 2003;Rosso and Becker, 2003;Renock and Becker, 2010;Gorski et al, 2012;Latta et al, 2012;Singer et al, 2012a;Singer et al, 2012b). The two-electron reduction of UO 2 2+ to U 4+ is more energetically favored than the one-electron reduction of UO 2 2+ to UO 2 + based on standard reduction potentials (i.e., E 0 U(VI)/U(IV) = 0.070 V, E 0 U(VI)/U(V) = −0.135 V, all potentials in this manuscript are with respect to the Ag/AgCl, saturated KCl,0.197 V vs. NHE) (Morris, 2002;Konings et al, 2006). However, direct reduction from UO 2 2+ to U 4+ is kinetically hindered due to the significant change between the structures of the reactant and the product, where the UO 2 2+ exists as the stable linear uranyl molecule with the short U=O bond (Burns, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%