2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.1c00890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Properties of 2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (R1234yf) and Propane (R290) Mixtures: (p, ρ, T) Behavior, Saturated Liquid and Vapor Densities, Critical Parameters, and a Mixture Model

Abstract: The (p, ρ, T) behavior of a refrigerant mixture of 50.00 mass% R1234yf and 50.00 mass% R290 was measured with the isochoric method. Along the six isochores (60, 121, 305, 500, 550, and 600 kg·m–3), a total of 40 single-phase (p, ρ, T) data points were obtained at temperatures from 330 to 400 K and pressures up to 6.6 MPa. In addition, the phase boundary of this mixture was experimentally investigated by visual observation of the vapor–liquid meniscus, and a total of 17 saturated densities and the critical para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, saturated vapor phase densities at temperatures above 338 K are estimated with errors between 0.6 and 4% and saturated liquid densities report relative errors between 0.7 and 6% (the latter is the point at 320 K). As highlighted in Appendix A (Table 9), lower deviations are obtained between the model and experimental data from Akasaka [25] for vapor phase densities at lower temperatures, while deviations between 4 and 7.8% are obtained in the subcooled liquid region; PR-WS model predicts vapor phase density very accurately, as shown by the comparison against experimental data from Brown et al [24] (deviations in the range 0.6 to 2.5 %), while, in line with the typical limitation of cubic Equations of State, it is inherently less accurate in the liquid density region, as confirmed by the deviations against data from Zhong et al [22], reporting discrepancies in the range from 7.7 to 9.3% of the actual density value.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelling With Peng-robinson Eos and Wong-sand...mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, saturated vapor phase densities at temperatures above 338 K are estimated with errors between 0.6 and 4% and saturated liquid densities report relative errors between 0.7 and 6% (the latter is the point at 320 K). As highlighted in Appendix A (Table 9), lower deviations are obtained between the model and experimental data from Akasaka [25] for vapor phase densities at lower temperatures, while deviations between 4 and 7.8% are obtained in the subcooled liquid region; PR-WS model predicts vapor phase density very accurately, as shown by the comparison against experimental data from Brown et al [24] (deviations in the range 0.6 to 2.5 %), while, in line with the typical limitation of cubic Equations of State, it is inherently less accurate in the liquid density region, as confirmed by the deviations against data from Zhong et al [22], reporting discrepancies in the range from 7.7 to 9.3% of the actual density value.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelling With Peng-robinson Eos and Wong-sand...mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In order to better validate the calibrated PR-WS model, density predictions are compared against the experimental data by [22], [23], [24] and [25]. Figure 10 represents the comparison between experimental data by Akasaka [25] and the predictions by this work: although it is expected that the cubic PR models fail to properly predict the critical point behavior and liquid densities, the version calibrated in this work has acceptable deviations for preliminary heat pump cycle simulations: predicted critical point is at 362 K and 41.4 bar against the 359.7 K and 38.8 bar experimentally determined by Akasaka [25]. Moreover, saturated vapor phase densities at temperatures above 338 K are estimated with errors between 0.6 and 4% and saturated liquid densities report relative errors between 0.7 and 6% (the latter is the point at 320 K).…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelling With Peng-robinson Eos and Wong-sand...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the experimental apparatus used in this work for measuring the (p, ρ, T ) behavior based on the isochoric method. This apparatus was successfully employed in our previous studies for pure fluids and mixtures, e.g., Higashi et al [10], Higashi and Sakoda [11], and Akasaka et al [12,13]. These references discuss the details of its structure, measurement procedure, and expected uncertainties, which are summarized below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%