1999
DOI: 10.1021/jp991802n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Parameters for the Solvation of Monatomic Ions in Water

Abstract: The estimation of solvation parameters for monatomic ions is reviewed and new values for the Gibbs energy, enthalpy, and entropy of solvation are given on the basis of the most recent thermodynamic data. The results for alkali metal and alkaline earth metal cations, and for the halide anions together with the sulfide anion, are examined within the context of a model based on the mean spherical approximation (MSA) for the Gibbs energy of ion-solvent interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
150
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
150
1
Order By: Relevance
“…65 There are several available sets of experimental hydration free energies available for comparison. [75][76][77][78][79][80][81] Hydration free energies and corrections calculated in this study are presented in Table III along with the experimental results of Tissandier et al, 77 Marcus et al, 76 and Schmid et al 75 Our corrected results ͑⌬G hyd real ͒ compare well with the data of Tissandier et al The larger anions ͑Br − and I − ͒ exhibit the greatest deviation from experiment, 7.5% and 3.0%, respectively. This is approximately the same accuracy obtained by Warren et al 82 for analogous anions in TIP4P-FQ.…”
Section: Single Ion Hydration Free Energiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…65 There are several available sets of experimental hydration free energies available for comparison. [75][76][77][78][79][80][81] Hydration free energies and corrections calculated in this study are presented in Table III along with the experimental results of Tissandier et al, 77 Marcus et al, 76 and Schmid et al 75 Our corrected results ͑⌬G hyd real ͒ compare well with the data of Tissandier et al The larger anions ͑Br − and I − ͒ exhibit the greatest deviation from experiment, 7.5% and 3.0%, respectively. This is approximately the same accuracy obtained by Warren et al 82 for analogous anions in TIP4P-FQ.…”
Section: Single Ion Hydration Free Energiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Helgeson and Kirkham [76] have shown that there is a linear correlation between the enthalpy of solvation of ions and the inverse of the effective ionic radius, while Marcus [77] has also demonstrated a correlation between the Gibbs free energy of solvation and the ionic radius. In Figure 2, we apply these observations to assess our choice of Born cavity diameters for the ions and find that they correlate linearly with the experimental Gibbs free energies of solvation [77][78][79]. This lends confidence to the values of σ with G solv, i can be used to estimate the cavity diameter of ions as an alternative to the approach of Rashin and Honig.…”
Section: Saft-vr Mie Electrolyte Modelsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…28 The higher solubility observed for the acid form compared to the sodium salt is consistent with the solvation energy of a sodium ion being 162.7 kcal/mole less than that of a hydronium ion. 29 We observed a five-fold increase in current density with the free sulfonic acid form over the sodium salt form ( Figure 3); this increase in performance can only be attributed to the increase in concentration of the reactants and improved ionic conductivity of the membrane. The higher solubility of the acid form avoided the abrupt drop in cell voltage resulting from concentration polarization caused by inadequate mass transport, especially at high current densities and low states-of-charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%