2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic evaluation of solar-geothermal hybrid power plants in northern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With the assistance of solar heat, up to an 11.6% increase in energy production from the geothermal brine is obtained for the Peak Power mode, whereas savings of up to 10.3% in the use of geothermal resources is obtained for the Save Geothermal Resource mode. Cardemil et al [ 12 ] conducted energetic and exergetic analyses for hypothetical single- and double-flash geothermal power plants, with each having four different brine characteristics, taking Save Geothermal Resource and Peak Power modes into account. A PTC field is used to supply solar heat to the system after the separator, both to the geothermal brine and as additional steam and superheat, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the assistance of solar heat, up to an 11.6% increase in energy production from the geothermal brine is obtained for the Peak Power mode, whereas savings of up to 10.3% in the use of geothermal resources is obtained for the Save Geothermal Resource mode. Cardemil et al [ 12 ] conducted energetic and exergetic analyses for hypothetical single- and double-flash geothermal power plants, with each having four different brine characteristics, taking Save Geothermal Resource and Peak Power modes into account. A PTC field is used to supply solar heat to the system after the separator, both to the geothermal brine and as additional steam and superheat, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of each component to the total exergy destruction was computed and illustrated in Grassman plot. Cardemil et al [ 15 ] presented a thermodynamics analysis using the first and second laws for the performance of single and double-stage geothermal power plants coupled by a parabolic through solar concentrating collector field, the influence of second law efficiency was discussed in every configuration allowed to identify the best engineering solution in the functioning of reservoir conditions, in all previous economic analyses were carried out based on the cost of electricity in northern Chile. Rudiyanto et al [ 16 ] presented the exergy assessment of the Kamojang geothermal power plant in Indonesia, the exergy destruction of each component of the entire cycle was tabulated and discussed, the main condenser was designated as the most inefficient components around of 180 MW of exergy destruction, additionally the authors presented the influence of the environmental temperature on the exergy destruction in the turbine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat and power balances for each component are taken according to [21]. Additionally, the second law efficiency proposed by [15] is used according to the following expression:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geothermal power plants utilize the hot geothermal water or fluid present in the ground to generate power. Thus, providing an environmentally benign method of power generation [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Different configurations and methodologies of geothermal entailing power generation exist depending on the method of energy transfer from the hot geothermal fluid to the power cycle working fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%