Thermodynamic correction of particle concentrations measured by underwing probes on fast-flying aircraft

Abstract

Abstract. Particle concentration measurements with underwing probes on aircraft are impacted by air compression upstream of the instrument body as a function of flight velocity. In particular, for fast-flying aircraft the necessity arises to account for compression of the air sample volume. Hence, a correction procedure is needed to invert measured particle number concentrations to ambient conditions that is commonly applicable to different instruments to gain comparable results. In the compression region where the detection of particles occurs (i.e. under factual measurement conditions), pressure and temperature of the air sample are increased compared to ambient (undisturbed) conditions in certain distance away from the aircraft. Conventional procedures for scaling the measured number densities to ambient conditions presume that the air volume probed per time interval is determined by the aircraft speed (true air speed, TAS). However, particle imaging instruments equipped with pitot tubes measuring the probe air speed (PAS) of each underwing probe reveal PAS values systematically below those of the TAS. We conclude that the deviation between PAS and TAS is mainly caused by the compression of the probed air sample. From measurements during two missions in 2014 with the German Gulfstream G-550 (HALO -High Altitude LOng range) research aircraft we develop a procedure to correct the measured particle concentration to ambient conditions using a thermodynamic approach. With the provided equation, the corresponding concentration correction factor ξ is applicable to the high-frequency measurements of the underwing probes, each of which is equipped with its own air speed sensor (e.g. a pitot tube). ξ values of 1 to 0.85 are calculated for air speeds (i.e. TAS) between 60 and 250 m s −1 . For different instruments at individual wing position the calculated ξ values exhibit strong consistency, which allows for a parameterisation of ξ as a function of TAS for the current HALO underwing probe configuration. The ability of cloud particles to adopt changes of air speed between ambient and measurement conditions depends on the cloud particles' inertia as a function of particle size (diameter D p ). The suggested inertia correction factor µ (D p ) for liquid cloud drops ranges between 1 (for D p < 70 µm) and 0.8 (for 100 µm < D p < 225 µm) but it needs to be applied carefully with respect to the particles' phase and nature. The correction of measured concentration by both factors, ξ and µ (D p ), yields higher ambient particle concentration by about 10-25 % compared to conventional procedures -an improvement which can be considered as significant for many research applications. The calculated ξ values are specifically related to the considered HALO underwing probe arrangement and may differ for other airPublished by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 5136 R. Weigel et al.: Thermodynamic correction of particle concentrations craft. Moreover, suggested corrections may not cover all impacts origi...

Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere over the Amazon Basin

“…The CAS-DPOL covers the size range of 0.6-50 µm in 17 bins of varying width. The probes are described in Voigt 926 M. O. Andreae et al: Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere et al (2017) and probes and data correction techniques in Weigel et al (2016). Information regarding the ice particle properties was obtained from the Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering probe (PHIPS-HALO), a single-particle cloud probe that measures microphysical and angular light scattering properties of individual particles .…”

In Situ Observations of Ice Particle Losses in a Young Persistent Contrail

“…An analysis of ice particle interarrival times (Field et al, 2003) showed no indication of particle shattering on the CAS probe inlet during contrail penetrations, as expected in the absence of large ice particles. Measured ice particle number concentrations, N m , are based on a CAS sample area of 0.21 mm 2 , as determined by laboratory calibrations, and a calculation of the sample volume following Weigel et al (2016) using thermodynamic corrections to account for compression effects.…”

Overview: Precipitation characteristics and sensitivities to environmental conditions during GoAmazon2014/5 and ACRIDICON-CHUVA

“…The probe was operated at a 1 Hz frequency. The major sources of uncertainty for the instrument are as follows (Weigel et al, 2016): (a) uncertainty in the cross-sectional area (0.278 mm 2 ± 15 %), (b) the relatively small sample volume (cross-sectional area multiplied by aircraft speed), and (c) counting statistics for each size bin. As noted by Molleker et al (2014), the CDP uncertainty is approximately 10 %.…”