Ribonucleases H from the thermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus and the mesophile Escherichia coli demonstrate a dramatic and surprising difference in their change in heat capacity upon unfolding (⌬Cp°). The lower ⌬Cp°of the thermophilic protein directly contributes to its higher thermal denaturation temperature (T m). We propose that this ⌬Cp°difference originates from residual structure in the unfolded state of the thermophilic protein; we verify this hypothesis by using a mutagenic approach. Residual structure in the unfolded state may provide a mechanism for balancing a high T m with the optimal thermodynamic stability for a protein's function. Structure in the unfolded state is shown to differentially affect the thermodynamic profiles of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins.T hermophilic organisms thrive at temperatures where proteins from mesophilic organisms are often completely unfolded and nonfunctional. Understanding the mechanisms by which proteins function at such high temperatures will help to optimize and design thermostable functional proteins for a variety of biotechnological applications. To learn how proteins from thermophilic organisms (thermophilic proteins) function at such elevated temperatures, we need to understand what makes these proteins different from their mesophilic homologs. This difference clearly does not reside in the overall structure of the native conformation; structures of numerous pairs of homologous proteins show that the thermophilic and mesophilic proteins invariably adopt the same fold (1). Examining the differences between individual amino acids and their specific interactions has led to the conclusion that the rules are extremely complex (2, 3).Thermodynamic comparisons of thermophilic and mesophilic pairs of proteins can provide a rational framework for understanding the functional differences between thermophilic and mesophilic proteins. A protein's thermodynamic stability is defined as the difference between the free energies of the native and the unfolded states (⌬G unf ϭ G U Ϫ G N ). The manner in which protein stability depends on temperature is illustrated by the so-called ''protein stability curve,'' which is defined by the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation (4, 5) (for an example, see Fig. 4). The temperature at which the ⌬G unf°e quals zero is the thermal denaturation midpoint (T m ), and the curvature of the stability curve, determined under standard conditions, is given by the heat capacity change upon unfolding (⌬Cp°). There are several ways in which a protein stability curve can be altered to result in a larger T m . An increase in the number of enthalpic interactions will raise the curve and make the protein more stable at every temperature. Alternatively, a lowering of the ⌬Cp°produces a ''flatter'' curve, which results in a higher T m for the same stability maximum. The question then becomes, how do thermophilic proteins alter these protein stability curves and how are they encoded in the structure and sequence?Thermus thermophilus and Escherichia coli RNa...