2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-022-11486-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic-based environmental and enviroeconomic assessments of a turboprop engine used for freight aircrafts under different flight phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dinc et al [34] introduced air inlet air cooling with a refrigeration system to the same gas turbine and obtained the normal ambient temperature power values with a PSFC improvement of 5.2% compared to the uncooled case. Additional studies on engine emissions can be found in the literature [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dinc et al [34] introduced air inlet air cooling with a refrigeration system to the same gas turbine and obtained the normal ambient temperature power values with a PSFC improvement of 5.2% compared to the uncooled case. Additional studies on engine emissions can be found in the literature [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the authors emphasized that due to high exergy destruction, it is necessary to focus on the CC component to improve the first law and second law efficiency ratios. Dinc et al [13] analyzed a turboprop engine using environmental, economic and thermodynamic perspective. Exergy recovery potentials were calculated in different flight scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its environmental impact index (mPts kWh -1 ) is determined relatively high with 49.23 mPts kWh -1 . Dinc et al [ 12 ] elaborated flight cycle of a turboprop engine including five phases point of view environmental effect. Although take-off phase has relatively the highest fuel consumption, minimum environmental parameter and thereby minimum CO 2 price was found to be 73.08 kgCO 2 day_cycle −1 and 8.48 € day_cycle −1 , respectively due to having the lowest time in mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%