2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic assessment of the Sr–In and Sr–Bi systems supported by first-principles calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Table 1. The calculated lattice parameters show a good agreement with experiments and previous calculations from literature [1], [5], [6], [17], [18]. Thus, we can rely on our atomic data set in what follows for the present work.…”
Section: International Journal Of Applied Physics and Mathematicssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results are shown in Table 1. The calculated lattice parameters show a good agreement with experiments and previous calculations from literature [1], [5], [6], [17], [18]. Thus, we can rely on our atomic data set in what follows for the present work.…”
Section: International Journal Of Applied Physics and Mathematicssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The other compounds SrIn5, SrIn3, Sr2In5, Sr2In3, SrIn and Sr3In2 were formed via the peritectic reactions. Later Bruzzone et al [3] reported a Sr5In3 phase instead of Sr3In2 and determined the crystal structure of Sr5In3 to be Cr5B3 type crystal by single crystal and powder techniques and in the work of Wang et al [1] the Sr5In3 phase was considered instead of Sr3In2, which was consistent with the assessment of Okamoto [4].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…al 24. and other similar Sr-Bi compounds have also been studied by first-principles calculations25. In this paper, we use the variable-composition evolutionary algorithm, which is very effective, to predict stable compositions and their structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%