2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.04.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic assessment of TbBr3 unary and NaBr–TbBr3 binary system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good consistency was observed between these experimental data and estimations in the literature. These data have been used to calculate [6] and assess [13] reliably the thermodynamic functions of TbBr 3 .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Good consistency was observed between these experimental data and estimations in the literature. These data have been used to calculate [6] and assess [13] reliably the thermodynamic functions of TbBr 3 .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CALPHAD technique has been extensively applied to industrial materials of many types, and yielded valuable information for a variety of practical applications. This technique has been applied to lanthanide-halide based systems and previous papers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] reported the principles for the formal description in terms of ionic sublattice model and the results obtained for the thermodynamic assessment of these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling of the liquid phase was made in accordance to the structural information from several sources [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] postulating the existence of the LnX 6 3− complex in various lanthanide-alkali halide melts. The same approach has already been adopted in two previous papers [1,2]. The two sub-lattice ionic solution model [28] with NdBr 6 3− cluster including in the anion site, i.e., (Li + ) P : (Br − , NdBr 6 3− , NdBr 3 ) Q was adopted in the present work.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present evaluated C S P expression from 298.15 K up to the melting point (T fus = 956 K) for solid NdBr 3 and C L P expression from the melting point up to 1300 K for liquid NdBr 3 were employed to obtain the c, d and e parameters in Eq. (1) for solid and liquid NdBr 3 , respectively, according to the procedure previously described in detail by Gong et al [1,2]. Slight adjustments to the previous C S P expression [3] were made so that the critically selected experimental data can be reproduced much better.…”
Section: Optimization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation