2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.07.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic and kinetic study of the single extraction of mercury from soil using sodium-thiosulfate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it might be inferred that in places with higher anthropogenic contamination, the presence of mercury species bound to sulphur is higher than in less contaminated samples. In the case of the most contaminated site the rate of extractable Hg using Na 2 S 2 O 3 corresponds with the results reported by Issaro et al (2010). They showed that the extraction yield of Na 2 S 2 O 3 usually reaches 50 ± 5% of Hg obtained by HNO 3 extraction from soils with high Hg levels from agricultural processes near Paris, France.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it might be inferred that in places with higher anthropogenic contamination, the presence of mercury species bound to sulphur is higher than in less contaminated samples. In the case of the most contaminated site the rate of extractable Hg using Na 2 S 2 O 3 corresponds with the results reported by Issaro et al (2010). They showed that the extraction yield of Na 2 S 2 O 3 usually reaches 50 ± 5% of Hg obtained by HNO 3 extraction from soils with high Hg levels from agricultural processes near Paris, France.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This phase of mercury can be obtained either by aqua regia extraction in a microwave oven (Fernándes-Martínez and Rucandio 2003), or using the saturated Na 2 S solution from the residue remaining after the extraction procedures (Revis et al 1989). The effect of the concentration of Na 2 S 2 O 3 on the extraction efficiency was in detail studied by Issaro et al (2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low soil:extractant ratios (for example, 1.0 g:100 mL or 1.5 g:100 mL) favour mercury extractions [24,28,55], although the analyst should assure sample homogeneity and representativeness and guarantee that detection limits for mercury quantification are achieved. This can be difficult in the water-soluble fraction, even in highly contaminated samples, since it generally represents a very low percentage of total mercury in soil [25].…”
Section: Soil:extractant Ratio and Time Of Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, research dedicated to mercury speciation/fractionation has gained attention in recent years [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thiosulfate salts are also suggested as the leaching reagent for the extraction of mercury from mercury-containing soil. Issaro et al [28] reported that 50% ± 5% of mercury can be extracted from contaminated soil after leaching with 0.01 M Na 2 S 2 O 3 for about 24 h. Lu et al [29] examined the effect of thiosulfate on mercury removal, and reported that Na 2 S 2 O 3 can be used as a chemical aid for improving trace mercury removal. However, since mercury may be present in various forms in contaminated wastes, detailed information on leaching behavior and mechanisms of different mercury components in the thiosulfate leaching system is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%