The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1986
DOI: 10.1042/bj2340515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic and kinetic studies on saccharide binding to soya-bean agglutinin

Abstract: The fluorescence of N-dansylgalactosamine [N-(5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)galactosamine] was enhanced 11-fold with a 25 nm blue-shift in the emission maximum upon binding to soya-bean agglutinin (SBA). This change was used to determine the association constants and thermodynamic parameters for this interaction. The association constant of 1.51 X 10(6) M-1 at 20 degrees C indicated a very strong binding, which is mainly due to a relatively small entropy value, as revealed by the thermodynamic paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k +1 value of 1.89 × 10 4 m −1 ·s −1 is approximately four orders of magnitude slower than diffusion‐controlled processes, the k +1 values for which are in the order of 10 8 −10 9 m −1 ·s −1 [35]. However, the association rate constant obtained here for the CuTMPyP–TCSL interaction is in the same range as that observed for several lectin–saccharide systems (5 × 10 3 to 5 × 10 5 m −1 ·s −1 [24,36–42]). Such slow second‐order rate constants are usually explained by invoking the formation of an intermediate [PL i , see ] that isomerizes to form the final complex (PL*).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The k +1 value of 1.89 × 10 4 m −1 ·s −1 is approximately four orders of magnitude slower than diffusion‐controlled processes, the k +1 values for which are in the order of 10 8 −10 9 m −1 ·s −1 [35]. However, the association rate constant obtained here for the CuTMPyP–TCSL interaction is in the same range as that observed for several lectin–saccharide systems (5 × 10 3 to 5 × 10 5 m −1 ·s −1 [24,36–42]). Such slow second‐order rate constants are usually explained by invoking the formation of an intermediate [PL i , see ] that isomerizes to form the final complex (PL*).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The values of Δ S in the SGSL–sugar interactions are far more negative than those reported for most other lectins [1, 26–29]. However, for some lectin–carbohydrate interactions, such as jacalin binding to GalNAc, T‐antigen and MeUmbαGal, Coccinia indica agglutinin binding to Umb(GlcNAc) 2 , winged bean basic lectin binding to MeUmbβGal, and wheat germ agglutinin binding to (GlcNAc) 2 or (GlcNAc) 3 , such highly negative values for Δ S have been reported [1, 24, 30–32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Among the various mono and disaccharides investigated, p NPβGal exhibited the strongest affinity for TCA‐I, which appears to be most likely due to additional interactions of the aromatic aglycon with a hydrophobic pocket in the neighbourhood of the binding site. Hydrophobic aglycons or substituents on sugars have been reported to stabilize their interaction with a number of lectins (11, 23, 25, 33, 36, 49–51). Fucose is only half as potent as galactose, clearly showing that the C‐6 hydroxyl group of galactose makes a positive contribution in the binding of carbohydrate with the lectin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%