2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic and kinetic considerations on degradations in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher activity of SrO in LSC compared to LSM is reported (17) (15). Moreover, reactants of the basic SrO should be acidic.…”
Section: Preferential Sulfur Poisoning In Lscmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A higher activity of SrO in LSC compared to LSM is reported (17) (15). Moreover, reactants of the basic SrO should be acidic.…”
Section: Preferential Sulfur Poisoning In Lscmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These findings correspond with earlier reports as grain boundary diffusion of Sr in Gd 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 1.9 has been found to be 10 5 times larger than the bulk diffusion and both calculations and experiments has shown grain boundaries as the dominant route for Sr diffusion. [24,27,28] figure 5b forming in the YSZ-CGO interface at the grain boundaries and spreading out along the interface. In figure 4 the density of these grains over the LSCF substrate is so high that when they elongate along the YSZ-CGO interface they come into contact and form a large continuous layer.…”
Section: Variation Of Cgo Barrier Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantially higher amount of Cr was detected in the contact material than in the cathode, indicating that LSCF reacts with the migrating Cr species and effectively traps them within the contact layer. The formation of SrCrO 4 crystals was widely reported in Co-containing perovskites such as (La,Sr)CoO 3 (LSC) and LSCF following exposure to Cr-containing vapors at elevated temperatures [32][33][34], and it is believed that this reaction is the primary mechanism for Cr capture in the Ag-LSCF composite contact materials. The mechanism for Cr reactivity in LSCF differs from that of LSM in that the SrCrO 4 crystals form directly on the surface of LSCF, effectively capturing the Cr and preventing further Cr migration within the cell [35].…”
Section: Comparison Of Cr Migration For Different Composite Contact Mmentioning
confidence: 98%