2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/280101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic and Interfacial Properties of DTABr/CTABr Mixed Surfactant Systems in Ethanolamine/Water Mixtures: A Conductometry Study

Abstract: Mixed-micelle formation in the binary mixtures of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTABr) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTABr) surfactants in water-ethanolamine mixed solvent systems has been studied by conductometric method in the temperature range of 298.1 to 313.1 K at 5 K intervals. It was observed that the presence of ethanolamine forced the formation of mixed micelle to lower total surfactant concentration than in water only. The synergistic interaction was quantitatively investigated using the th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cmc values of the mixed surfactant solutions in conjunction with those of the pure components at different temperatures thus obtained are collected in Table . The cmc’s of aqueous HDMimCl and DTAB are found to be in good agreement with those reported in the literature. , The micellization process depends, in general, on two factors, namely, the electrostatic interactions between the charged headgroups of the mixing surfactant components and the hydrophobic interactions owing to their hydrocarbon tails. In the present study, both HDMimCl and DTAB surfactant ions bear positive charges which would try to hinder the formation of mixed micelles. Thus, in the mixtures studied, the first factor opposes mixed micelle formation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The cmc values of the mixed surfactant solutions in conjunction with those of the pure components at different temperatures thus obtained are collected in Table . The cmc’s of aqueous HDMimCl and DTAB are found to be in good agreement with those reported in the literature. , The micellization process depends, in general, on two factors, namely, the electrostatic interactions between the charged headgroups of the mixing surfactant components and the hydrophobic interactions owing to their hydrocarbon tails. In the present study, both HDMimCl and DTAB surfactant ions bear positive charges which would try to hinder the formation of mixed micelles. Thus, in the mixtures studied, the first factor opposes mixed micelle formation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We have also obtained a similar trend for the values of Δ H M , indicating that translational energy loss by monomers and heat generation due to hydrophobic interaction is lesser than the energy absorbed by breaking the iceberg structure of water during micellization. Esan et al investigated the interactions of CTAB + DTAB in an aqueous medium. The values of Δ G M and β R are more negative for the CTAB + DTAB system than our system, indicating that micellization of HDMimCl + DTAB is less energetically feasible than that of the CTAB + DTAB system .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The positive values of Δ H ° 11.80 J mol −1 in CPE-OFX 0309 and 10.35 J mol −1 in CPE-DC 193C reflects to the endothermic natural of solubilisation affinity of atrazine in the micellar phases. 62 The endothermic nature was also shown by the increase in the amount of solubilisation with temperatures due to the increase number of hydrophobic micelles in surfactant rich phase while the CMC of the non-ionic surfactants decrease on increasing temperature. 63 Increasing the temperature was known to stimulate the rate of diffusion of atrazine in the external surface of surfactant and decrease the viscosity of the solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%