2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic analysis of solar energy integrated underground coal gasification in the context of cleaner fossil power generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations in this work show that the cost of electricity can be as low as 20 €/MWh, which is the same value as is presented in the work by Pei et al [22]. It has to be, however, considered that energy loss in a UCG process typically occurs due to water influx, underground cavity pressure drop, gas loss to the surrounding strata, and high temperature gasifying medium, which raises the cost of operation and lowers the product gas quality and profit [23]. It should also be considered that adaptations during the course of operation will be performed and that the syngas quality will vary from time to time.…”
Section: Ucg Economic Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The calculations in this work show that the cost of electricity can be as low as 20 €/MWh, which is the same value as is presented in the work by Pei et al [22]. It has to be, however, considered that energy loss in a UCG process typically occurs due to water influx, underground cavity pressure drop, gas loss to the surrounding strata, and high temperature gasifying medium, which raises the cost of operation and lowers the product gas quality and profit [23]. It should also be considered that adaptations during the course of operation will be performed and that the syngas quality will vary from time to time.…”
Section: Ucg Economic Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A good temperature match inside the cooler is realized, and the exergy loss is reduced. A comparison between the steam Rankine cycle and the sCO 2 cycle for power generation from solar energy indicated that the net thermal efficiency of the sCO 2 cycle was 32.9%, while it was 28.2% for the steam Rankine cycle (Shrivastava and Prabu, 2016).…”
Section: Concentrated Solor Power Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of fuel's conversion, da/dt, was the linear function of a temperature-dependent rate constant and function of conversion, which was described as k(T) and f(a), respectively [17],…”
Section: Kinetic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%