2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic analysis of parabolic trough and heliostat field solar collectors integrated with a Rankine cycle for cogeneration of electricity and heat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, the efficiency increase is only from 22.7% to 23.8%, a total of 1.1%. This is reasonable since low solar flux also reduces the useful energy rate of the receiver and with the knowledge that the flux is also low, the efficiency will remain the same [8]. The efficiency of the receiver is low because spill losses are about 75 percent due to the small receiver space compared to the reflected image area of the heliostat field.…”
Section: Fig 4 Breakdown Of the Energy Loss In Heliostat Fieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5, the efficiency increase is only from 22.7% to 23.8%, a total of 1.1%. This is reasonable since low solar flux also reduces the useful energy rate of the receiver and with the knowledge that the flux is also low, the efficiency will remain the same [8]. The efficiency of the receiver is low because spill losses are about 75 percent due to the small receiver space compared to the reflected image area of the heliostat field.…”
Section: Fig 4 Breakdown Of the Energy Loss In Heliostat Fieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, Therminol VP-1 is used as heat transfer fluid at the outlet temperature of 391°C. The energy received by solar field system can be written as follow using the equation given by Shahin et al [17]:…”
Section: Solar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 depicts, the efficiency increase is only from 71.6% to 73.5%, a total of 1.9%. This can be attributed to the fact that a low solar flux also reduces the useful energy generation rate of the receiver and with the knowledge that the flux is also low; the efficiency will remain the same [6].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%