2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic analysis of high pressure methane adsorption in Longmaxi shale

Abstract: Thermodynamic analyses of high pressure methane adsorption in shale are rarely reported because of the lack of a reliable approach for obtaining the true adsorption uptake from observed adsorption isotherms and the routinely used, oversimplified Clausius-Clapeyron (C-C) approximation. This work extends our previously proposed dual-site Langmuir adsorption model to calculate the isosteric heat of adsorption analytically from the observed adsorption isotherms for high pressure methane adsorption isotherms on Lon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(79 reference statements)
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ji et al reported that pre-gas window shales had Q st values in the range 7.3-15.3 kJ mol −1 and a gas window shale was 18.4 kJ mol −1 [8]. These Q st values are similar to previously published values for carbon (9-24 kJ mol −1 ) [53][54][55], coal (10-22 kJ mol −1 ) [56] and shale (7-24 kJ mol −1 ) [8,[76][77][78].…”
Section: The Role Of Shale Structure and Kerogen Maturitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Ji et al reported that pre-gas window shales had Q st values in the range 7.3-15.3 kJ mol −1 and a gas window shale was 18.4 kJ mol −1 [8]. These Q st values are similar to previously published values for carbon (9-24 kJ mol −1 ) [53][54][55], coal (10-22 kJ mol −1 ) [56] and shale (7-24 kJ mol −1 ) [8,[76][77][78].…”
Section: The Role Of Shale Structure and Kerogen Maturitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Effect of temperature on methane on shale under four different conditions at different temperatures calculated by equations (17) to (20), respectively. (a) 303.15k, (b) 313.15K, (c) 323.15K and (d) 333.15K (Tang et al, 2017)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…show the corresponding CH 4 density map. It is known that methane tends to accumulate on graphite nanopore walls, forming an adsorbed layer on the surface (Tang et al, 2017). The density distribution of CH 4 is nearly the same for both the EMD and NEMD simulations in the center (bulk) and near-surface regions of the pore.…”
Section: (A)-3(c)mentioning
confidence: 79%