The steelmaking industry is the largest energy consuming manufacturing sector in the world and is responsible for 5-7 % of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions. It is therefore necessary to increase energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gases emissions in these industries. COG, a by-product of coking plants, is one of the key ways to achieve these goals. COG, which is used as fuel in different processes of the steelmaking plants, is a H 2 -rich gas with a high energetic potential. However, there is a significant surplus that usually is burnt away in torches, and even directly emitted into the air. With the aim of tackling this wasting of resources and energy inefficiency, several alternatives have been proposed during recent years. In the present work, these alternatives are reviewed and their main advantages and drawbacks are discussed.Coke oven gas (COG) is a point of high interest to enhance energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions in the steel industry [2,3,5,6]. COG is a by-product of coal carbonisation to coke which is co-generated in the coking process [7]. In spite of the reduction of coke consumption in the blast furnace (and therefore COG production), during the past few decades, blast furnaces cannot operate without coke which implies COG will continue to be produced in large quantities in the future [3]. COG, has a very complex composition after leaving the coke oven. Firstly, the gas is cooled down to separate tars to subsequently undergo different scrubbing processes to eliminate NH 3 , H 2 S and BTX [3]. After these conditioning stages, cold COG comprises H 2 (~55-60 %), CH 4 (~23-27 %), CO (~5-8 %), N 2 (~3-6 %), CO 2 (less than 2 %) along with other hydrocarbons in small proportions. Currently 20-40 % of COG produced is normally utilised as fuel in the actual coke ovens [8][9][10]. The remaining COG generated Final version published in Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 110 , 150--159 is generally employed in alternative processes of the steel mills [3,7] but most surplus is currently burnt off in torches and even in some cases directly emitted to the air [10,11].These vary due to the highly dynamic nature of the steel-making process [8].In addition, COG approximately accounts for 18 % of the energy output of a coking plant due to its large low calorific value, which varies from 17 to 18 MJ/m 3 [3]. Both COG energetic properties and production excess lead to large GHG emissions, energy inefficiency and most importantly a significant environmental impact which in turn is also reflected in a clearly improvable economic efficiency [3,4,12]. As an example of this inefficiency, U.S. Steel Corp. has been able to save over 6 million dollars annually by using COG as fuel in blast furnaces [8].During past few decades, various alternatives to valorise COG have been proposed, including its use for energy production, a direct utilisation in the blast furnace to produce "pig iron" or gas treatment for the production of chemicals and fuels.This work is aimed to provide an overview of some of the most promising a...