2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14010189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Analysis of Biomass Gasification Using Aspen Plus: Comparison of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Models

Abstract: The gasification process involves several reactions that occur simultaneously and are interrelated by several independent variables. Simulation tools can help us to understand the process behaviour and predict the efficiency and final composition of the products. In this work, two thermodynamic equilibrium models developed in Aspen Plus® software were assessed: a non-stoichiometric model based on the feedstock composition and on the most probable compounds expected from the results of the gasification process … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on the key output variables (syngas composition, calorific value, etc.) [14,15]. Simulating accurately the performance of a biomass gasifier additionally allows optimizing the gasifier integration in complex energy systems [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the key output variables (syngas composition, calorific value, etc.) [14,15]. Simulating accurately the performance of a biomass gasifier additionally allows optimizing the gasifier integration in complex energy systems [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HCOALGEN method includes different empirical correlations to estimate heat of combustion, enthalpy of formation and specific heat; whereas the DCOALIGT method is based on the empirical correlations from the Institute of Gas Technology (IGT) to estimate density. The most usual physical property methods reported in the literature for modeling gasification processes are PR-BM and RKS-BM [18,19,24,[32][33][34][35], both providing comparable results [36]. The Peng-Robinson cubic equation of state with Boston-Mathias alpha function (PR-BM) was used to estimate all the thermodynamic properties of the conventional components involved in the integrated process.…”
Section: Plant Description and Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The integrated gasification plant is operating under steady-state conditions within a zero-dimensional and time independent approach where hydrodynamic effects are disregarded [14, 17-19, 24, 33-35, 37-39]. • Heat losses to the surrounding environment and pressure drops across all unit operations are neglected [19,24,[32][33][34][35][37][38][39]]. • All chemical reactions reach thermodynamic equilibrium conditions and reaction kinetics are not considered [14, 17-19, 24, 33-35, 37-39].…”
Section: Plant Description and Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahabuddin and Bhattacharya [37] investigated the gasification behavior of bituminous coal using different reactants of CO 2 , steam and a mixture of CO 2 and steam under entrained flow gasification conditions at temperatures of 1000 • C and 1200 • C with atmospheric pressure. González-Vázquez et al [38] developed two thermodynamic equilibrium models in Aspen Plus. Both models were validated with experimental data from a semi-pilot scale gasifier using pine kernel shells (PKS) as feedstock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%