2019
DOI: 10.3390/en13010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Analysis of a CO2 Refrigeration Cycle with Integrated Mechanical Subcooling

Abstract: Different alternatives are being studied nowadays in order to enhance the behavior of transcritical CO 2 refrigeration plants. Among the most studied options, subcooling is one of the most analyzed methods in the last years, increasing cooling capacity and Coefficient Of Performance (COP), especially at high hot sink temperatures. A new cycle, called integrated mechanical subcooling cycle, has been developed, as a total-CO 2 solution, to provide the subcooling in CO 2 transcritical refrigeration cycles. It cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This contribution is greater the higher the water temperature and the lower the evaporation level are (when further the heat source and hot sink are). The effect of the subcooling cycle is higher at high rejection temperatures and low evaporation levels because these are the conditions where the behaviour of the plant needs to be more improved due to the reduction of the COP, as it was presented by Nebot-Andrés et al (2019b). The contributions represent between 25.6% and 21.5% at 25.0ºC, between 31.5% and 24.1% at 30.4ºC and between 33.2 and 24.9 at 35ºC.…”
Section: Cooling Capacitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This contribution is greater the higher the water temperature and the lower the evaporation level are (when further the heat source and hot sink are). The effect of the subcooling cycle is higher at high rejection temperatures and low evaporation levels because these are the conditions where the behaviour of the plant needs to be more improved due to the reduction of the COP, as it was presented by Nebot-Andrés et al (2019b). The contributions represent between 25.6% and 21.5% at 25.0ºC, between 31.5% and 24.1% at 30.4ºC and between 33.2 and 24.9 at 35ºC.…”
Section: Cooling Capacitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Basic flash gas bypass transcritical systems lack efficiency at high heat sink temperatures mainly because of high throttling irreversibilities [5]. Several research works have been carried out to make these systems suitable for high ambient temperature conditions, including ejectors [6] and mechanical subcooling [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizando esta mejora para sistemas con CO2 de simple etapa, Cechinato et al 2009 [11] realizó un análisis termodinámico de este sistema para un ciclo con un nivel de evaporación, realizando el subenfriamiento con CO2, pero con un ciclo de compresión de vapor independiente del ciclo principal, teniendo, a términos prácticos, el mismo principio de funcionamiento. Así mismo, Nebot-Andrés et al 2019 [58] analizó termodinámicamente el uso del subenfriamiento integrado en un ciclo de simple etapa con CO2, obteniendo incrementos del COP de hasta el 15.9% para temperaturas de evaporación de -10ºC.…”
Section: Página 44unclassified
“…The minimum pressure limitation is needed to keep a minimum pressure differential at the expansion valves. Although a minimum pressure differential around 3.5 bar is needed in all the valves for proper operation [54], in a transcritical booster, the minimum flash tank pressure considered is approximately 5 bar higher than the pressure of the medium temperature loads [58]. Thus, for the evaporation temperature of -6ºC (≈30 bar), the minimum flash tank pressure considered will be 35 bar.…”
Section: R744 Flash Tank Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%