2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcht.2001.0862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermochemistry of the reaction { phospho enol pyruvate(aq)+d -erythrose 4-phosphate(aq) + H2 O(l) = 2-dehydro-3-deoxy- d - arabino -heptonate 7-phosphate(aq) + phosphate(aq) }

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates of possible systematic error are combined in quadrature together with the statistical uncertainty in the measured value of D r H m (cal) expressed as one estimated standard deviation of the mean, to obtain combined standard uncertainties [9] for each result. These combined standard uncertainties are then multiplied by two to arrive at the final results from our experiments: D r H m (cal) = À(76.1 ± 0.9) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (1); D r H m (cal) = À(88.1 ± 0.8) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (2); D r H m (cal) = À(90.7 ± 0.8) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (3); D r H m (cal) = À(81.0 ± 1.6) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (4); D r H m (cal) = À(82.6 ± 1.4) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (5); and D r H m (cal) = À(97.6 ± 1.1) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (6). The molalities m in columns 3 to 5 are those obtained after mixing of the enzyme and substrate solutions and prior to any reaction.…”
Section: Results Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These estimates of possible systematic error are combined in quadrature together with the statistical uncertainty in the measured value of D r H m (cal) expressed as one estimated standard deviation of the mean, to obtain combined standard uncertainties [9] for each result. These combined standard uncertainties are then multiplied by two to arrive at the final results from our experiments: D r H m (cal) = À(76.1 ± 0.9) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (1); D r H m (cal) = À(88.1 ± 0.8) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (2); D r H m (cal) = À(90.7 ± 0.8) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (3); D r H m (cal) = À(81.0 ± 1.6) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (4); D r H m (cal) = À(82.6 ± 1.4) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (5); and D r H m (cal) = À(97.6 ± 1.1) kJ AE mol À1 for reaction (6). The molalities m in columns 3 to 5 are those obtained after mixing of the enzyme and substrate solutions and prior to any reaction.…”
Section: Results Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…chromatogram (see Section 2.2). The mass fraction of water in each of the nitrilase samples was determined by means of Karl Fischer titration [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are given in table 1. The mass fraction of water listed in table 1 for the compounds involved in these reactions and the internal standard, 1-hexanol were determined by Karl Fischer titration [23]. The enzyme used in this study was ketoreductase (EC 1.1.1.2) from BioCatalytics, Inc., Pasadena, CA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…method described below and found to have purities greater than or equal to those stated by the vendors. The mass fractions of water given in table 1 for the compounds involved in these reactions and the internal standard, 1-hexanol, were determined by using Karl Fischer titration [21]. The ketoreductase (EC 1.1.1.2) used in this study was from Biocatalytics, Pasadena, CA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%