1979
DOI: 10.1524/zpch.1979.118.1.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermochemie des Systems MgO—B2O3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, considering the uncertainty in experimental results given in Refs. [28,30,31], and experimental difficulties at high temperatures, the correlation between experimental and calculated activities of MgO and the enthalpy of formation of the solid phases is acceptable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, considering the uncertainty in experimental results given in Refs. [28,30,31], and experimental difficulties at high temperatures, the correlation between experimental and calculated activities of MgO and the enthalpy of formation of the solid phases is acceptable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hauck et al [28] measured the chemical potential of MgO as a function of the composition referred to pure solid MgO, by the EMF-technique using cells with MgF 2 as fluorine-ion conducting electrolyte at 1173 K. Based on their experimental results, the Gibbs energy of formation G f 0 Δ referred to solid MgO of the following stoichiometric solid compounds was estimated on the assumption that the enthalpy of formation of these magnesium borate compounds are approximately independent of temperature in the range from about 900 to 1300 K: …”
Section: Thermodynamic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existence of 3MgO·B 2 O 3 proves that a reaction between MgO and 2MgO·B 2 O 3 occurred: [5] According to Hauck and Muller (1979), the formation of 3MgO·B 2 O 3 occurs easily at high temperatures, and the standard Gibbs free energy G 0 (in kJ mol −1 ) for Equation [5] can be calculated by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%