“…The standard deviation between the two methods, from several work reactions, is ±1.12 for CH 3 C( O)OOH, ±0.12 for C(OOH)H 2 CHO, ±0.24 for C·H 2 C( O)OOH, ±0.74 for CH 3 C( O)OO·, ±0.48 for C(OOH)H 2 C·O, and ±0.17 for C(OO·)H 2 CHO. A recent study by Sun and Bozzelli [16] compares results for enthalpy calculations on neopentyl radical, neopentaldehyde, and hydroperoxy-neopentyl radicals among the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p), B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,2p), and CBS-Q//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) methods. The standard deviation between B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) and CBS-Q//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) on six species varies from ±0.7 to ±1.6 kcal mol −1 and the standard deviation is ±0.38 to ±1.76 kcal mol −1 between B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,2p) and CBS-Q//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p [12] with DFT and −39.52 [19] by CBSq//MP2 (full)/6-31G(d).…”