2019
DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2018.1564203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-Hydraulic Performance of Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger With Different Cambered Airfoil Fins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different channels have been investigated, including straight channels [5][6][7], zigzag channels [8][9][10], sinusoidal channels [11][12][13][14], S-shaped channels [15,16], helical twine PCHE [17], and channels with airfoil fins [18][19][20][21][22]. Zhao et al [23] proposed the Fanning friction factor in the straight channel PCHE by numerical calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different channels have been investigated, including straight channels [5][6][7], zigzag channels [8][9][10], sinusoidal channels [11][12][13][14], S-shaped channels [15,16], helical twine PCHE [17], and channels with airfoil fins [18][19][20][21][22]. Zhao et al [23] proposed the Fanning friction factor in the straight channel PCHE by numerical calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the fin configurations had little effect on the overall thermo-hydraulic performances at low mass flow rates, and the airfoil fin with the staggered arrangement was better than the other types of fins. Chu et al [16] studied three types of airfoil fin (NACA-8315, 8515, and 8715) PCHEs with consistent and reverse layouts used as condensers in the supercritical CO 2 Brayton power cycle. The results showed that the NACA-8515 airfoil fins with both consistent and reverse layouts on average improved the heat transfer coefficient by 28% and 11% with an increase of the pressure drop by 150% and 22%, respectively, compared with the symmetrical airfoil fins (NACA-0015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, PCHEs are manufactured by photochemical etching [6] and diffusion bonding technologies, and are able to reliably operate in large temperature ranges (from 73 K to 1173 K) and high pressure conditions (up to 60 MPa) [7]. To date, there are several flow channel geometries developed for PCHEs, e.g., straight channels [8][9][10], zigzag channels [11][12][13], wavy channels [14-16], S-shaped channels [17,18] and channels with airfoil fins [19][20][21], while the performance of different channels has been extensively studied. However, mechanical performance is a key concern for PCHEs, and mechanical design of PCHEs is largely concerned with the particular surface geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%