2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-economic assessment of a micro CHP system fuelled by geothermal and solar energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mole fraction of 60% isobutane leads to a reduction of EGC of 4.0% compared to propane. In general, the obtained SIC are in a good agreement to the mentioned investigations [40][41][42][43]. In the context of the uncertainties of fluid properties, a sensitivity analysis is conducted for propane/isobutane (50/50).…”
Section: Economic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A mole fraction of 60% isobutane leads to a reduction of EGC of 4.0% compared to propane. In general, the obtained SIC are in a good agreement to the mentioned investigations [40][41][42][43]. In the context of the uncertainties of fluid properties, a sensitivity analysis is conducted for propane/isobutane (50/50).…”
Section: Economic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Existing thermo-economic analysis related to ORC power systems focus on fluid selection concerning pure working fluids and power plant configurations, like combined heat and power generation or other complex systems [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Regarding ORC power plants for waste heat recovery with an electric capacity below 5 kW, Quoilin et al [39] determine specific investment costs for 8 working fluids in the range of 2,136 €/kW and 4,260 €/kW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar study is also presented by Zhou et al (2013). The combination of solar and geothermal heat sources powering ORC is also studied by Tempesti and Fiaschi (2013;Tempesti et al, 2012). Their studies show that R245fa allows the achievement of the lowest price of electricity production and the lowest overall cost of the CHP plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, Astolfi et al [29] analysed a combined concentrating solar power system and a geothermal binary plant powering an ORC, and they obtained a levelized costs of electricity of 145-280 €/MWh (competitive value with respect to large, stand-alone concentrating solar power plants [29]) depending on the location of the plant. Tempesti et al [30,31] investigated the combination of geothermal heat sources and solar powering a ORC system, and also Zhou et al [32] studied these hybrid plants, concluding that the cost of electricity production can be reduced by 20% when this technology is used instead of the stand-alone Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) [32]. Zhou [33] developed a model simulation of a hybrid geothermal solar both subcritical and supercritical ORC using Aspen to compare the two configurations, and results showed that the solar to electricity cost of supercritical ORC is about 1.5%-3.3% less than those of the subcritical system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%