1968
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-13207-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermische Turbomaschinen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) The first-principles loss model is accurate within 1-2 percentage points as compared to 3D RANS for all the selected test cases. In contrast, the semi-empirical Traupel loss model [27] significantly underestimates the stage efficiency, but it provides an accurate trend prediction with loading. The results obtained with 3D URANS are in accordance with those obtained by steady-state simulations and the physical loss model, except for the case niMM 1 , in which the trend of c Pv is not monotone along the expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) The first-principles loss model is accurate within 1-2 percentage points as compared to 3D RANS for all the selected test cases. In contrast, the semi-empirical Traupel loss model [27] significantly underestimates the stage efficiency, but it provides an accurate trend prediction with loading. The results obtained with 3D URANS are in accordance with those obtained by steady-state simulations and the physical loss model, except for the case niMM 1 , in which the trend of c Pv is not monotone along the expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The time-averaged total-to-total efficiency obtained by steady and unsteady CFD for the test cases iCO 2 and iMM characterized by increasing loading coefficient is displayed in Fig. 14, along with the efficiency trend calculated with the turbine stage model coupled to the physical loss model as well as to the semi-empirical Traupel loss model [27]. The color bars in the charts are indicative of 61=2% efficiency deviation with respect to the time-averaged values computed by 3D URANS.…”
Section: Numericalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, many articles can be found dealing with the design and calculation of the mechanical behavior of the coupled blade system. An overview of the fundamentals can be found in Traupel, 3 while Traupel, 4 Prohl 5 or Thomas 6 presented a more detailed work on the calculation of vibrational stress of packaged bladed systems. However, due to the limited calculation resources in the past, damping wire designs for blades were mainly based on empirical and analytical methods 7 as well as operation experience, often with trial and error.…”
Section: Damping Elements Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damping performance diagram is shown in Figure 8 where the vibration amplitudes are plotted in relation to the excitation force and µ as a parameter. The amplitudes are normalized to the measured value, obtained in the test rig, and the excitation force is normalized to the static steam loads on the blade airfoil at the corresponding thermodynamic load point from the measurements, thus it is equal to the stimulus (Traupel 3 ).
Figure 8.Damping performance diagram.
…”
Section: Numerical Investigation Of the Dynamic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressor off-design characteristics were derived by applying a stage-stacking analysis [34][35][36], while the calculations of the isentropic efficiency of each stage were based on the pressure drop assumptions presented in Templalexis et al [37], and the works of Lieblein [38] and Saravanamuttoo et al [39]. The gas turbine off-design characteristics were derived following the method described in Stodola [40] and in Traupel [41].…”
Section: Thermoenvironomic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%