“…MOFs with aromatic multicarboxylate ligands could be preeminent candidates for researching single crystal to single crystal (SCSC) transformations, because a part of them possess good stability in air and/or in solvent. ,− Some aromatic multicarboxylate ligands, such as 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H 2 BDC), 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (H 3 BTC), biphenyl-3,5,3′,5′-tetracarboxylate acid (3,5-H 4 bptc, Scheme a), biphenyl-3,4,3′,4′-tetracarboxylate acid (3,4-H 4 bptc, Scheme b), and biphenyl-2,2′,4,4′-tetracarboxylic acid (2,4-H 4 bptc, Scheme c), have been extensively studied, ,− and their MOFs’ SCSC transformations have also been studied. , While compared with these pure carboxylate ligands, our particular interest focuses on the ligand 6,6′-dinitro-2,2′,4,4′-biphenyltetracarboxylic acid (H 4 nbtc, Scheme e) because of the nitro and carboxyl doubly functionalized groups, the rotated hindrance of two phenyl rings, suitable size of the phenyl tether, and inadequate exploration in the domain of MOFs. After several examples were reported by us recently, , here as an extension study, a series of similar Mn(II) MOFs {[Mn 2 (nbtc)(H 2 O) 2 (S)]·S·0.5H 2 O} n [S = DMF ( 1 ), DMA ( 2 ), NMP ( 3 ), DEF ( 4 )] (DMF = N , N ′-dimethylformamide, DMA = N , N ′-dimethylacetamide, NMP = N -methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, DEF = N , N ′-diethylformamide), exhibiting unique three-dimensional (3D) double-walled open-frameworks, have been successfully obtained.…”