2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermally excited 630.0 nm O(1D) emission in the cusp: A frequent high‐altitude transient signature

Abstract: [1] We highlight why 630.0 nm auroral emissions excited by thermal electrons are expected to be significant in the cusp and are occurring more often than generally recognized. We note conditions when they are likely to occur and provide a simple formula to calculate the altitude discriminated (R/km) and line-of-sight integrated 630.0 nm intensity (kR). The formula is applied to incoherent scatter radar data near the cusp to produce 2-D maps of thermal red line aurora. We estimate when the thermally excited red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with earlier studies, the thermal component was significant when the electron temperature exceeded 3000 K with electron density enhancements between (1–5) × 10 11 m −3 [ Egeland et al , ]. In agreement with earlier studies [ Carlson et al , ; Johnsen et al , ; Kozyra et al , ; Egeland et al , ], our estimated emission altitude for the thermal component is higher than the generally accepted emission altitude of 225–250 km for the 630.0 nm emission [ Lockwood et al , ]. Our findings agree with Egeland et al [] that the thermal excitation may be responsible for the 630.0 nm emission at 350 km and above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with earlier studies, the thermal component was significant when the electron temperature exceeded 3000 K with electron density enhancements between (1–5) × 10 11 m −3 [ Egeland et al , ]. In agreement with earlier studies [ Carlson et al , ; Johnsen et al , ; Kozyra et al , ; Egeland et al , ], our estimated emission altitude for the thermal component is higher than the generally accepted emission altitude of 225–250 km for the 630.0 nm emission [ Lockwood et al , ]. Our findings agree with Egeland et al [] that the thermal excitation may be responsible for the 630.0 nm emission at 350 km and above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Theoretically, Kozyra et al [] suggested that the emission altitude for the thermal component should be expected near 500 km which is higher than the estimated peak emission altitudes for the events studied here. However, the peak emission altitude for the event on 22 January 2012 is closer to 400–450 km reported by Carlson et al []. The estimated peak emission altitudes for both events studied in our work are in agreement with thermal component emission peak near 350 km reported by Wickwar and Kofman [].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations