2009
DOI: 10.1115/1.3128671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Therapy in Urologic Systems: A Comparison of Arrhenius and Thermal Isoeffective Dose Models in Predicting Hyperthermic Injury

Abstract: The Arrhenius and thermal isoeffective dose (TID) models are the two most commonly used models for predicting hyperthermic injury. The TID model is essentially derived from the Arrhenius model, but due to a variety of assumptions and simplifications now leads to different predictions, particularly at temperatures higher than 50 degrees C. In the present study, the two models are compared and their appropriateness tested for predicting hyperthermic injury in both the traditional hyperthermia (usually, 43-50 deg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energy and frequency factor can be determined from the slope and intercept of the linear fit, respectively. [7, 15, 32] This procedure involves tedious experiments under many different conditions over several orders of magnitude in heating time. With the controlled heating rate method proposed, it is possible to obtain the kinetic parameters from fewer experiments (3 runs, instead of 5 × 3 runs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation energy and frequency factor can be determined from the slope and intercept of the linear fit, respectively. [7, 15, 32] This procedure involves tedious experiments under many different conditions over several orders of magnitude in heating time. With the controlled heating rate method proposed, it is possible to obtain the kinetic parameters from fewer experiments (3 runs, instead of 5 × 3 runs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors may arise when the value used was obtained from experiments with a much different temperature range or heating mechanism (e.g., heating rate, intensity). For example, the time required for tissue coagulation in thermal therapy (> 50 °C) may be less than the critical CEM 43 obtained from experiments in the hyperthermia temperature range (40 – 45 °C) [41]. To make use of the simplicity of the thermal dose model and to ensure prediction accuracy, a chart of applicable critical CEM 43 in various different ranges of temperature could be further established using the same experimental set-up and processing method used in this study with varying HIFU intensities and exposure durations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of thermal therapy, called thermo-ablation, destroys the tumor cells directly via cell necrosis, coagulation or carbonization by exposing them to temperatures ranging from 46 to 56°C in short intervals (seconds to a few minutes) (Nayak et al 1977;Jordan et al 1999;Lui et al 2003). The kinetics of thermal injury is a key factor for estimating cell survivability, and the kinetics of different cell lines has been addressed (Diller and Ryan 1998;He et al 2009). Some surgical techniques of thermal injury to kill malignant cells/tissue apply a peak temperature ranging from 50 to 70°C for several seconds to several minutes (Diller and Ryan 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%