2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal stability and fire behaviour of flame retardant high density rigid foams based on hydromagnesite-filled polypropylene composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An optimum concentration of 2 wt% GnP was found in terms of guaranteeing the maximum thermal stability in the earlier stages of thermal decomposition (see Figure 9), with PEI-GnP foams with higher GnP amounts (5 and 10 wt%) displaying faster decompositions. This behaviour was attributed to the existence of two competitive effects of GnP in terms of the thermal stability of the foam: on the one hand the already mentioned physical barrier effect of GnP, delaying the escape of volatiles from the pyrolysis in the same way as other fillers having similar platelet-like morphologies [25]; and on the other hand its inherently high thermal conductivity, explaining the faster thermal decomposition in the first decomposition stage of foams with higher GnP contents, counteracting GnP's barrier effect observed at lower amounts. In the second stage the high ther- Figure 9.…”
Section: Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimum concentration of 2 wt% GnP was found in terms of guaranteeing the maximum thermal stability in the earlier stages of thermal decomposition (see Figure 9), with PEI-GnP foams with higher GnP amounts (5 and 10 wt%) displaying faster decompositions. This behaviour was attributed to the existence of two competitive effects of GnP in terms of the thermal stability of the foam: on the one hand the already mentioned physical barrier effect of GnP, delaying the escape of volatiles from the pyrolysis in the same way as other fillers having similar platelet-like morphologies [25]; and on the other hand its inherently high thermal conductivity, explaining the faster thermal decomposition in the first decomposition stage of foams with higher GnP contents, counteracting GnP's barrier effect observed at lower amounts. In the second stage the high ther- Figure 9.…”
Section: Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delay in the decomposition could also be attributed to the simultaneous formation of char during the early stage of the decomposition, resulting in an effective protection for the material [25]. A tortuous path for gas and heat diffusion may have been created by the dispersed graphene nanoplatelets, delaying the escape of pyrolysis gases [19,26].…”
Section: Thermal Stability Of Low Density Polycarbonate-graphene Nanomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realinho et al [24], developed lame-retardant polypropylene composite foams by combining a basic hydrated magnesium carbonate (hydromagnesite), an intumescent additive based on ammonium polyphosphate, an organo modiied-montmorillonite (MMT), and graphene nanoplatelets with PP. Azodicarbonamide was used in chemical foaming.…”
Section: Polypropylene-based Foamsmentioning
confidence: 99%