1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(94)91043-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal shock behaviour of various first-wall materials under simulation load tests by laser beam irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impinging energy densities between 0.2 and 20 MJ/m 2 with pulse lengths ranging from 0.1 to 20 ms were realized. 124,125) Presently, these tests are performed at NRG in Petten (the Nederland), where the laser can also be operated inside a hot cell.…”
Section: Thermal Shock Tests In High Power Laser Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impinging energy densities between 0.2 and 20 MJ/m 2 with pulse lengths ranging from 0.1 to 20 ms were realized. 124,125) Presently, these tests are performed at NRG in Petten (the Nederland), where the laser can also be operated inside a hot cell.…”
Section: Thermal Shock Tests In High Power Laser Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24] Also fluidized beds with ambient air were used for this purpose. 25 Severe upquenching was achieved using burners, [26][27][28][29] molten metal, [30][31][32] lasers [33][34][35] and film heaters. 36 For this purpose also electrical induction, 37 resistance 38 and discharge 39 have been used on refractories containing carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by (microscopic) examination of the crack pattern, 18,28,31,[33][34][35]45 recording the number of test cycles or the quenching temperature difference to reach material failure, 1,2,32 by determination of the residual mechanical properties 1, [3][4][5][8][9][10]25,[36][37][38][39]42 and of the weight loss after layer-wise spalling. 43 Other characterization techniques rely on the measurement of acoustic emission during thermal shock 11,22,24,26,44,46,47 and the determination of the change in sound velocity, 40,48,49 attenuation 48 and resonance frequency 6,16,20,29 due to thermal shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%