44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-1247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Sensor Development and Testing for NASA Entry Probe Thermal Protection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error in temperature measured using platinum resistance temperature detectors is 0.25C or 0.5% [23].…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The error in temperature measured using platinum resistance temperature detectors is 0.25C or 0.5% [23].…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To combine the spatial and temporal responses of a heat flux sensor, only Eqs. 7and (8) are needed, as repeated here.…”
Section: Fig 3 Comparison Of Slug Calorimeter Response Using Differementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accurately measuring any two of these allows the third to be calculated since ΔT=T 1 -T 2 . For the two sensors already mentioned [8,9] this will not require any change in design as these sensors already measure the required temperatures. Also, none of the aforementioned analysis placed any requirements on which temperatures were used in evaluating the slug calorimeter term.…”
Section: Fig 3 Comparison Of Slug Calorimeter Response Using Differementioning
confidence: 99%