2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal residual stress investigation in Al 2024/ Cu-Al-Ni adaptive composites by X-Ray diffractometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In AMCs, strengthening is often ascribed to direct and indirect strengthening effects -the direct being the contribution from load transfer from the matrix to the particles, and the indirect from the additional dislocations created during cooling on account of the difference in CTEs between the matrix and the reinforcement (Chawla and Shen, 2001). In the case of the Cu-18Zn-7Al-0.3Ni particles reinforced AMCs some additional factors could be advanced for the improved strength compared to that of the SiC reinforced AMC -the likely improved interface bonding between the particles and matrix, and the compressive type residual stresses reported to be asserted by SMA particles on the matrix on cooling (Lee and Taya, 2004;Kotresh et al, 2018). Metallic reinforcements are reported to offer better interface bonding to metallic matrices compared to ceramic particles (Selvakumar et al, 2017;Alaneme et al, 2019c).…”
Section: Compressive Stress-strain Behaviour and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In AMCs, strengthening is often ascribed to direct and indirect strengthening effects -the direct being the contribution from load transfer from the matrix to the particles, and the indirect from the additional dislocations created during cooling on account of the difference in CTEs between the matrix and the reinforcement (Chawla and Shen, 2001). In the case of the Cu-18Zn-7Al-0.3Ni particles reinforced AMCs some additional factors could be advanced for the improved strength compared to that of the SiC reinforced AMC -the likely improved interface bonding between the particles and matrix, and the compressive type residual stresses reported to be asserted by SMA particles on the matrix on cooling (Lee and Taya, 2004;Kotresh et al, 2018). Metallic reinforcements are reported to offer better interface bonding to metallic matrices compared to ceramic particles (Selvakumar et al, 2017;Alaneme et al, 2019c).…”
Section: Compressive Stress-strain Behaviour and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improved bonding results in enhanced interface strength, which allows for effective load transfer between the matrix and the particles (Huang et al, 2018). Furthermore, the compressive type residual stresses asserted by the particle on the matrix on cooling, is reported not to be relieved by heattreatment (Kotresh et al, 2018), and hence effective even when the composite is exposed to elevated temperatures. The corollary is that despite the relatively lower melting point of the Cu-18Zn-7Al-0.3Ni alloy compared to the refractory SiC, the SMA provides higher mechanical strength at temperatures within the hot working confines of the AMC, which is typical for most automobile engine working temperatures.…”
Section: Compressive Stress-strain Behaviour and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The W/2024Al composite is a type of particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composite (PRAMC) used as a noble candidate for radiation shielding with desirable mechanical properties such as high strength, excellent corrosion resistance, and low density [1,2,3,4]. In the production process, the mechanical properties of PRAMC can be further improved by use of a high-temperature solution followed by rapid quenching and subsequent aging treatment [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%