1981
DOI: 10.1021/ja00393a059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal rearrangement of 1,1-difluorospiropentane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…112 For example, consistent with the methylenecyclopropane results (section II.4.1.3), the two geminal fluorine substituents of 1,1-difluorospiropentane (28) exerted little overall kinetic effect on the homolysis of the proximal C(1)-C(2). 113 The observed regioselectivity of the reaction did not allow one to distinguish between the two possible peripheral homolysis mechanisms, a and b. However, simple analysis of the product ratios from thermal rearrangement of deuterium-labeled analogue 31 allowed determination of the ratio of mechanisms a and b to be 3:1.…”
Section: Unimolecular Thermal Homolytic Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…112 For example, consistent with the methylenecyclopropane results (section II.4.1.3), the two geminal fluorine substituents of 1,1-difluorospiropentane (28) exerted little overall kinetic effect on the homolysis of the proximal C(1)-C(2). 113 The observed regioselectivity of the reaction did not allow one to distinguish between the two possible peripheral homolysis mechanisms, a and b. However, simple analysis of the product ratios from thermal rearrangement of deuterium-labeled analogue 31 allowed determination of the ratio of mechanisms a and b to be 3:1.…”
Section: Unimolecular Thermal Homolytic Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fluorine substitution of a cyclopropane has been shown to impart unique effects different even from those of other halogens. 17 Experimentally, it has been shown to increase ring strain by 4.5-5.0 kcal/mol per fluorine, 18 it significantly weakens the bond opposite the carbon bearing the fluorine substituent, [19][20][21] and it has been suggested to slightly strengthen 20 or weaken 19 the adjacent bonds. Similarly, geminal difluoro substitution of cyclopropane has been experimentally estimated to weaken the bond opposite the CF 2 by 9-10 kcal/mol 21 but imparts much less effect on the adjacent bonds weakening them by 0-2 kcal/mol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, geminal difluoro substitution of cyclopropane has been experimentally estimated to weaken the bond opposite the CF 2 by 9-10 kcal/mol 21 but imparts much less effect on the adjacent bonds weakening them by 0-2 kcal/mol. 20 Consequently, it was unclear whether the gem difluoro substitution of the CBI cyclopropane would alter or enhance the stereoelectronicallycontrolled reaction regioselectivity for nucleophilic ring opening, and, a priori, it was not clear whether this substitution would enhance or diminish the inherent electrophilic functional reactivity. Consequently, we have prepared the F 2 CBI alkylation subunit in efforts to examine the effect of the difluoro substitution on the structure, reactivity, and reaction regioselectivity of the agent and its impact on the biological properties of the resulting analogs of 1-3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spiropentane rearrangements: Gajewsky found that the rearrangement of the hydrocarbon spiropentane to form methylenecyclobutane occurred with the cleavage of the C1–C2 bond [ 94 ]. Dolbier then used deuterium labeling to study the analogous reaction of 1,1-difluorospiropentane ( 101 ) ( Scheme 47 ) [ 95 ]. The cleavage of the C1–C2 bond that is proximal to the fluorine resulted in the formation of two isomeric methylenecyclobutane derivatives 102 and 103 by a radical cyclization ( Scheme 47 ).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[94]. Dolbier then used deuterium labeling to study the analogous reaction of 1,1-difluorospiropentane (101) (Scheme 47) [95]. The cleavage of the C1-C2 bond that is proximal to the fluorine resulted in the formation of two isomeric methylenecyclobutane derivatives 102 and 103 by a radical cyclization (Scheme 47).…”
Section: Scheme 38: Cis-trans-epimerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%