Catastrophic Events Caused by Cosmic Objects
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6452-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Radiation and Fires After Impacts of Cosmic Objects

Abstract: After impacts of cosmic bodies their kinetic energy transforms into heat. Materials of an impactor, target, and air are heated to high temperatures; therefore, it seems natural that impacts of cosmic objects are followed by fires. The traces of large fires were first searched for in the layers of sedimentary rocks that approach the periods of biotic mass extinctions in age. There is a widely known hypothesis of Alvarez et al. (1980) about mass extinctions at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K/T) boundary after the imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most probable scenario (mechanism 2) is that (1) the projectile entered the atmosphere and started to heat up (Artemieva and Shuvalov ); (2) shortly before hitting the ground, the radiative heat of the bolide ignited the trees (Svetsov ); (3) the air‐blast crashed and heated trees in vicinity of impact site; (4) the excavation process mixed heated wood and “colder” rocks into ejecta; (5) ignited wood continued to change into charcoal for a relatively short time within the ejecta blanket. This scenario would explain the intermixing of charred organic material of the similar 14 C age from Picea branches within ejecta, with most of the charcoal present within the till‐rich ejecta, and few larger fragments within dolomite‐rich ejecta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most probable scenario (mechanism 2) is that (1) the projectile entered the atmosphere and started to heat up (Artemieva and Shuvalov ); (2) shortly before hitting the ground, the radiative heat of the bolide ignited the trees (Svetsov ); (3) the air‐blast crashed and heated trees in vicinity of impact site; (4) the excavation process mixed heated wood and “colder” rocks into ejecta; (5) ignited wood continued to change into charcoal for a relatively short time within the ejecta blanket. This scenario would explain the intermixing of charred organic material of the similar 14 C age from Picea branches within ejecta, with most of the charcoal present within the till‐rich ejecta, and few larger fragments within dolomite‐rich ejecta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B) TPQ (1530-1450 BC) for the Kaali impact based on the combined results of 11 samples (mean value: 3237 AE 10 14 C yr BP, v 2 test passed), excluding the samples Kaali 4.4a,4.4a*,4.4b,and 4.4b*. Calibration is based on IntCal13 atmospheric curve (Reimer et al 2013), plot is from OxCal v4.2.4 (Ramsey and Lee 2013). bolide ignited the trees (Svetsov 2008); (3) the air-blast crashed and heated trees in vicinity of impact site; (4) the excavation process mixed heated wood and "colder" rocks into ejecta; (5) ignited wood continued to change into charcoal for a relatively short time within the ejecta blanket. This scenario would explain the intermixing of charred organic material of the similar 14 C age from Picea branches within ejecta, with most of the charcoal present within the till-rich ejecta, and few larger fragments within dolomite-rich ejecta.…”
Section: Charcoal Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of those, the Tunguska airburst in 1908 over Siberia, created impact-related magnetic spherules, meltglass, nanodiamonds, and iridium, as discussed in Florenskiy (1965), Kirova and Zaslavskaya (1966), Firestone et al (2007), Bunch et al (2012), and Kinzie et al (2014). This airburst produced a high-pressure blast wave energetic enough to topple 80 million trees across ∼2000 km 2 (Florenskiy 1965;Svetsov 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal pulse scorched trees near the epicenter, before transient high temperatures rapidly subsided from 110,0007C at the center of the fireball. Numerous sampling sites at Tunguska indicate that temperatures and the severity of biomass burning decreased outward with distance from ground zero, initially igniting ∼200 km 2 and subsequently spreading to consume ∼500 km 2 of forest (Svetsov 2008). Because the impact-ignited fires were of low intensity, the burn layer contained charcoal amounts similar to those associated with normal, nonimpact ground fires (Svetsov 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() showed that although wildfires can ignite as a response to meteoritic impact(s), they would unlikely be ignited globally and mostly in the downrange direction. Recent studies by Svetsov (), Daniau (), Daniau et al . (), and Marlon et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%