2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021je007015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Properties of Liquid Iron at Conditions of Planetary Cores

Abstract: Iron is the dominant element in the cores of terrestrial planets (de Pater & Lissauer, 2015). For Earth it comprises ∼90 wt% of its liquid outer core and ∼97 wt% of solid inner core (Stacey & Davis, 2008). Similar proportions of iron may also be present in the cores of smaller rocky planets like Mercury (Chabot et al., 2014) or more massive exoplanets cataloged as super Earths (Boujibar et al., 2020). Accordingly, thermal properties of iron at high pressures (P) and temperatures (T) are of great significance i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate the pressure correction to be 16.6 GPa over the pressure regime of Mars’ core (19–37 GPa, Figure 1b). This is in line with (a) the observation that the difference between simulated and observed pressure becomes larger at lower pressures, for example, 8 GPa at Earth’s inner‐outer core boundary (330 GPa) and 10 GPa at its CMB (136 GPa) (Badro et al., 2014; Bajgain et al., 2021), and (b) a recent evaluation of a ρ ‐dependent pressure shift determined by comparing calculations to the density of hcp Fe and by benchmarking against that of liquid Fe at ambient pressure (Li et al., 2022), in the form of a sigmoid function ΔP = 17.38/(1 + exp(( ρ − 11.395) · 1.341)), which corresponds to a pressure correction of 17 ± 0.4 GPa in the density range of 6–9 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimate the pressure correction to be 16.6 GPa over the pressure regime of Mars’ core (19–37 GPa, Figure 1b). This is in line with (a) the observation that the difference between simulated and observed pressure becomes larger at lower pressures, for example, 8 GPa at Earth’s inner‐outer core boundary (330 GPa) and 10 GPa at its CMB (136 GPa) (Badro et al., 2014; Bajgain et al., 2021), and (b) a recent evaluation of a ρ ‐dependent pressure shift determined by comparing calculations to the density of hcp Fe and by benchmarking against that of liquid Fe at ambient pressure (Li et al., 2022), in the form of a sigmoid function ΔP = 17.38/(1 + exp(( ρ − 11.395) · 1.341)), which corresponds to a pressure correction of 17 ± 0.4 GPa in the density range of 6–9 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have the advantage of being performed within a single computational framework that thereby eliminates random errors associated with combining distinct experimental determinations of individual binary‐ or ternary systems. Yet, most ab initio calculations have focused on higher pressures than those relevant for the Martian core, with studies focusing on applying their results to the cores of the Earth (Badro et al., 2014; D. Huang et al., 2019; Ichikawa & Tsuchiya, 2020; Umemoto & Hirose, 2020) and super‐Earths (Li et al., 2022; Wagle & Steinle‐Neumann, 2019). Relatively few ab initio studies have focused on smaller planetary cores, partly because of the complex spin transitions that occur in d ‐orbital electrons in liquid Fe at lower pressures (Edgington et al., 2019; Morard et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting thermal equation of state P(ρ m , T) is in excellent agreement with experiments. 37 The self-diffusion coefficient of a liquid can be evaluated via two methods: One is from the long time slope of the mean square displacement (MSD), 38…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[116] K S Adiabatic bulk modulus 1306 GPa Ref. [116] C P Isobaric heat capacity 790 J kg −1 K −1 Ref. [116] r IC Inner-core radius 1221 km Ref.…”
Section: Fig A1 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[116] C P Isobaric heat capacity 790 J kg −1 K −1 Ref. [116] r IC Inner-core radius 1221 km Ref. [117] r OC Outer-core radius 3480 km Ref.…”
Section: Fig A1 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%