2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2010.04.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal properties of 1T-TaS2 at the onset of charge density wave states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 11(a)-(c) show the resulting space and time dependence of the lattice temperature in the uppermost 200 nm of the sample for λ ⊥ values of 1, 3.9 and 11.5 W K −1 m −1 . The first λ ⊥ value is the best fit to our experimental results, whereas the latter two values represent the measured minimum and maximum values for the in-plane heat conductivity of 1T-TaS 2 at temperatures of 100 and 180 K, respectively [81,82] (the out-of-plane heat conductivity has not been measured). Figure 11(d) shows the corresponding temporal evolutions of the lattice temperature within the first nanometer of the sample, i.e.…”
Section: Heat Diffusion Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figures 11(a)-(c) show the resulting space and time dependence of the lattice temperature in the uppermost 200 nm of the sample for λ ⊥ values of 1, 3.9 and 11.5 W K −1 m −1 . The first λ ⊥ value is the best fit to our experimental results, whereas the latter two values represent the measured minimum and maximum values for the in-plane heat conductivity of 1T-TaS 2 at temperatures of 100 and 180 K, respectively [81,82] (the out-of-plane heat conductivity has not been measured). Figure 11(d) shows the corresponding temporal evolutions of the lattice temperature within the first nanometer of the sample, i.e.…”
Section: Heat Diffusion Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…We expect that around this temperature the photo-induced CDW/PLD phase should transform back into the CCDW phase. Not surprisingly, the simple 1D heat diffusion model with constant λ ⊥ does not capture this phase transition at which the heat conduction coefficient and also the dimensionality of the problem may change [81,82]. Nevertheless, the agreement between experiment and simulation on the sub-750 ps timescale is strong evidence that the observed long-term relaxation dynamics of the 'spectroscopic order parameter' CDW is governed by heat diffusion.…”
Section: Heat Diffusion Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for decreasing temperature, presented in [52], give for the I-CDW and NC-CDW comparable values within the experimental error. For the low temperature C-CDW phase, the McMillan formula yields, with µ * = 0.20 [63] and a Debye temperature Θ D of 249 K [46,64,65], a superconducting critical temperature T c = 1.2 K, in fair agreement with the value at normal pressure of 1.5 K reported by Nagata et al [47]. For the high-pressure (5 GPa) NC-CDW phase, Rossnagel derives from the McMillan formula and the input data Tc = 5 K, μ * = 0.20 and ΘD = 249 K, an e-ph interaction constant λ = 0.85 [63], also in agreement with the present value of λ for the NC-CDW phase, although HAS experiments are performed in vacuum conditions.…”
Section: T-tas 2 (001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the Cp/T (T) curve shows a moderate decrease followed by a clear change of the slope at TCDW ~ 150 K. Similar discontinuous decrease/increase (depending on the rise/decrease of temperature) of the specific heat in the vicinity of TCDW was observed in the case of incommensurate-to-commensurate transition in 2H-TaSe2 22 . Moreover, a discontinuity in the specific heat of 1T-TaS2 was predicted by the calculation based on the Born von Karman model 23 . Upon further cooling, the Cp/T (T) curve reveals a sharp drop at ~ 50 K, which may be related to the upturn in the magnetic susceptibility at a similar temperature range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%