2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-004-5353-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal preference of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, and brown trout, Salmo trutta – implications for their niche segregation

Abstract: SynopsisThis study tested a new experimental apparatus to estimate thermal preferences of fish. The apparatus was designed to minimise the effect of the thermal history of the fish and allow for easy feeding. The set-up consisted of two connected sections of an aquarium, both receiving an excess of food, with slightly different water temperatures. Initially, the fish spent most of its time in one of the sections, but when the temperatures were slowly increased (or decreased), the fish spent increasingly more t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(49 reference statements)
5
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results therefore contradict the strong correlation between maximum feeding rates and final thermal preference observed in many species of fish (McCauley and Casselman 1980;Jobling 1981;Larsson 2005). In addition, zooplankton biomass is greater in the upper metalimnion and epilimnion than at the lower temperatures preferred by mysids (Boscarino unpubl.…”
Section: Modified Modelcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Our results therefore contradict the strong correlation between maximum feeding rates and final thermal preference observed in many species of fish (McCauley and Casselman 1980;Jobling 1981;Larsson 2005). In addition, zooplankton biomass is greater in the upper metalimnion and epilimnion than at the lower temperatures preferred by mysids (Boscarino unpubl.…”
Section: Modified Modelcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…However, in the current study, hypoxia and temperature tolerance differences between char and salmon could possibly be related to the preferred environmental conditions of the species, similar to the findings of Eliason et al (2011) with Pacific salmon populations. Char prefer cold temperatures (Larsson, 2005), which during summer are found at the bottom of big lakes, which may be hypoxic (e.g. Hawley et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fritz and Garside, 1974;Deacon and Hecht, 1995;Cardona, 2000;Serrano et al, 2010). Interpretation of these studies has focused on correlating choices with optimal growth (Jobling, 1981) or food conversion (Larsson, 2005). Indeed, common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) maintained at apparent optimal salinities invested more energy in processing food than fish maintained at suboptimal salinities (Gracia-Lopez et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%