2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(03)01601-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal neutron self-shielding correction factors for large sample instrumental neutron activation analysis using the MCNP code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, measurement of the thermal neutron flux at the surface of the sample by activation foils enables prediction of the thermal neutron self-shielding within the sample provided that the matrix material and geometrical parameters of the large sample are known. 9 Gamma ray detection efficiency FIG. 4 shows the predicted gamma ray detector efficiency as a function of gamma ray energy for cylindrical and cylindrical cell samples, consisted of ceramic material and iron.…”
Section: Inhomogeneity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, measurement of the thermal neutron flux at the surface of the sample by activation foils enables prediction of the thermal neutron self-shielding within the sample provided that the matrix material and geometrical parameters of the large sample are known. 9 Gamma ray detection efficiency FIG. 4 shows the predicted gamma ray detector efficiency as a function of gamma ray energy for cylindrical and cylindrical cell samples, consisted of ceramic material and iron.…”
Section: Inhomogeneity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whole object analysis). 7 In order to produce quantitative results, the Large Sample Neutron Activation Analysis (LSNAA) technique requires correction methods to compensate for the effects of (a) thermal neutron self-shielding within the sample, during sample irradiation 8,9 and (b) source geometry and gamma ray attenuation by the sample material during gamma ray counting. 10,11 In the present work, appropriate correction factors for neutron self-shielding, gamma-ray attenuation and volume distribution of the activity in voluminous samples composed of iron and ceramic material are presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LSNAA the sample is irradiated at a research reactor (using a graphite thermal neutron column or a radial channel) and is subsequently transferred to a gamma ray spectrometry system to be counted either as a whole [1] or using a scanning geometry counting configuration [2]. Corrections are required for self-shielding of the activating neutrons, self-absorption of gamma rays, heterogeneity of the sample and geometric factor during gamma counting [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Analysis of the acquired gamma spectra allows for the evaluation of the elemental composition of the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrections are required for self-shielding of the activating neutrons [5,6], self-absorption of gamma rays [7], heterogeneity of the sample [8,9] and geometric factor during gamma counting [10]. Moreover, k 0 based calibration techniques for LSNAA have been presented [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%