2007
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.44.1500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal-Neutron Capture Cross Section and Resonance Integral of Americium-241

Abstract: The thermal-neutron capture cross section (0;g) and the resonance integral (I 0;g) leading to the ground state of 242 Am were measured by an activation method for neutron capture by 241 Am. A method with gadolinium, which was similar to the cadmium difference method, was used to measure the cross section 0;g with attention to resonances of 241 Am. Americium chloride samples containing 241 Am radioisotope were irradiated for 68 h in the long-irradiation plug of the Kyoto University Research Reactor, KUR. Wires … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for LLFPs are listed in Table 5.1, and for MAs [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] in Table 5.2, together with previously reported data. Here, the symbols σ eff , σ 0 , and I 0 denote the effective cross section, the thermal neutron capture cross section, and the resonance integral, respectively; σ 0 is the cross section at the neutron energy of 25.3 meV.…”
Section: Measurement Activities By the Activation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The results for LLFPs are listed in Table 5.1, and for MAs [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] in Table 5.2, together with previously reported data. Here, the symbols σ eff , σ 0 , and I 0 denote the effective cross section, the thermal neutron capture cross section, and the resonance integral, respectively; σ 0 is the cross section at the neutron energy of 25.3 meV.…”
Section: Measurement Activities By the Activation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…With the use of Gd filter (effective cut-off energy around 0.1 eV), the problem of the bias is practically nonexistent. This method was used e.g., by Nakamura [9]. An independent study [11], based on analytical corrections to the Westcott formalism due to deviation of the neutron spectrum from idealized shape, yields similar correction factors for 241 Am(n,γ ) cross section at 25.3 meV as the above described numerical method.…”
Section: Feedback To Spectrum Averaged Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10]. Both methods are crude since they approximate the neutron spectrum ϕ(E) with only two free parameters (three in case variations in spectrum temperature are allowed).…”
Section: Feedback To Spectrum Averaged Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the measurement of thermal neutron capture cross sections, an activation method has been widely used using a research reactor [30][31][32]. In order to separate thermal neutrons from epi-thermal neutrons, a Cd cut-off method has been applied.…”
Section: Evaluations Of Capture Cross Sections For the Thermal Neutromentioning
confidence: 99%